Traditional kilt length

[Granite]

Hello Gentlemen,

I have a Traditional kilt, fitting from my navel to just about mid-kneecap, but I feel it is a shade too long.
I may ask the lady who made it for me to shorten it by one inch or so (as long as this isn't a cardinal sin!)

Just out of curiosity, what length should a traditional kilt be for someone who is approx 6ft 1.5" in height?

Thank you.

[bubba]

Actually Granite, mid knee is about right. There isn't really any set length because the measurement is taken from navel to mid knee and can vary between people of the same overall height.

[Mike n NC]

Hey Granite, first off...Welcome to X-Marks. Traditional kilt length is much a matter of choice, within certain limits. Generally the accepted 'correct' length is from the top of the knee to about mid-knee. Personally I like mine to hit right at the top of my kneecap but I do have one or two that come to mid knee.

You may also find that by adjusting where you wear the waistband will make a difference in the length. I have one kilt with a traditional waist that I have to wear a little low to keep it at the right length so you might think about raising yours a bit.

Also to consider, is the kilt hemmed or selveged? If you have it hemmed, and there is no reason you can't, you lose the original look of the kilt. I don't think it will be very noticable but it is a thought.

Mike

[Blu (Ontario)]

From what you describe, your kilt is probably at the right length now. A traditional kilt should be worn well above the hips - (well above where men tend to wear trousers these days.) I'm exactly the same height as you and a couple of my kilts are 25" from waist band to selvedge (hem). They rise to just under the ribcage. Also a kilt that is too short might look strange if worn with a formal type jacket or waistcoat. IMHO making this kilt shorter would be a mistake.

[kiltimabar]

I am convinced that the reason so many people at Scottish games wear their kilt so long (below the knee or even lower) is really accidental. Because the kilt is traditionally made with the high rise up to the rib cage--no doubt necessary for warmth in winter Scotland but not in summer California--and since they are not used to wearing anything that high, they wear it at the belt line they are used to. Then the kilt winds up too long.

When I had my second kilt made, I had them do it two inches shorter so I could wear the belt line normally and still have the bottom at the place I wanted. What gives me the right to wear it at the waist and not at the ribs? The same right everyone has to wear the bottom edge where they want to have it.

Dave S.

[motorman4life]

FWIW, I prefer my kilt to fall at the bottom of the kneecap. I usually measure from where I wear my pants (and shorts) to the center of the kneecap, but I end up wearing it a tad lower (on my hips) and the length seems about right for me. I have tried pulling it up higher (near the ribcage) and it feels really odd to me, both at the top and the bottom.

I think it really is a personal preference thing. Do what feels best for you and don't worry about what everyone else may think! If you want to see some examples of various lenghts, look at some of the pics on my site (link below).

[Scotus]

It's a very personal thing. Mid-kneecap is fine. I like the kilt to fall at toward the top of the kneecap. Something to keep in mind with the traditional, however, is that it can be place an inch or two above the navel (I think it's best above the navel). If you haven't, try wearing it slightly higher before trying to change the kilt. Wearing it a little higher is perfectly acceptable. I personally don't understand the aversion that men who are new to the kilt have to the high length of the traditional. I know we wear pants lower, but the traditional kilt is just that... traditional. It doesn't (thankfully!) change with the fashions.