Guess what made the "Top 10 Historically Inaccurate Films" list?

**Tattoo Bradley** · 21st March 08, 02:06 PM

http://movies.yahoo.com/feature/10mo...naccurate.html

**McClef** · 21st March 08, 02:12 PM

Gosh! Enough of them have something to do with Mr Gibson!

**Phil** · 21st March 08, 02:15 PM

Here was another one - http://jamesfollett.dswilliams.co.uk...amm%20lies.htm - but hell, why let the truth get in the way of a good story.

**Nervous Jock** · 27th March 08, 10:02 AM

Originally Posted by Phil

Here was another one - http://jamesfollett.dswilliams.co.uk...amm%20lies.htm - but hell, why let the truth get in the way of a good story.

I have a major sad on about this one.

**Dirk Skene** · 21st March 08, 02:16 PM

Cool link. Thanks. I am still reading through it.

**Sheep In Wolf's Clothing** · 21st March 08, 02:24 PM

I just saw that before I popped back here. I had the same reaction the first time I saw a trailer for that new caveman (yes I will use that term) movie. Some one, somewhere, please make a historical movie that is accurate....please.
Sara

**northernsky** · 21st March 08, 02:55 PM

Great link. Thanks. And I too notice a Mel theme happening there...

**emolas** · 21st March 08, 03:21 PM

Great list although I don't think you can call 2001 historically inaccurate since it wasn't actually history when it was made. Maybe precognitively incorrect but then, so was 1984. It does seem that Mel had his hand in more than his share of these movies and in case anyone is considering seeing 10000 BC, I would strongly advise against it. That was the most horrible movie I have seen in a long time and it saddens me that it took 109 minutes of my life that I will never get back.

**Panache** · 21st March 08, 03:27 PM

The Spartans didn't wear leather speedos?

?

Cheers

Jamie

**davedove** · 25th March 08, 05:37 AM

Originally Posted by emolas

Great list although I don't think you can call 2001 historically inaccurate since it wasn't actually history when it was made. Maybe precognitively incorrect but then, so was 1984.

I have to agree with this. The film wasn't historical when it was made, it was predictive.

Fans of Star Trek will realize that the Eugenics Wars were supposed to happen in the 90's, but I haven't seen any supermen running around. Although, I read a couple of Star Trek books that submitted that the wars did happen, just behind the scenes with secret laboratories and such.