Going Commando Under A Kilt Has Officially Been Condemned?

**aj555** · 3rd January 12, 11:02 AM

Found this article from another forum back on November 2010

http://www.glamour.com/fashion/blogs...+to+Fashion%29

**Chas** · 3rd January 12, 11:05 AM

Sorry aj, this is old news. November '10 - that's when we discussed it here.

Regards

Chas

**Tobus** · 3rd January 12, 11:38 AM

Ugh, yes, I remember that discussion. Not pretty.

End result: no, there's nothing "official" about their statement. It was just someone's opinion, and you know what they say about those...

**ccga3359** · 3rd January 12, 12:07 PM

One does not go "Commando" in a kilt, one may go "Regimental". Commando is if one who wears trousers sans undergarments.

**Father Bill** · 3rd January 12, 12:40 PM

And some of us still are in the regiments.

**aj555** · 3rd January 12, 01:45 PM

I tried searching, but I must of been searching for the wrong title. Found hundreds of threads on people asking personal opinions about what they should do, but not on this particular article. Thanks for giving me the end results of the discussion though. Sounded a little bogus anyway.

**Mikewood** · 3rd January 12, 02:13 PM

So much is said about a private matter like What I choose to wear as clothing is my private personal choice and as long as I don't break any laws should be no concern to anyone else.

**Bigkahuna** · 4th January 12, 11:10 PM

That's It, Father Bill!!! Uncase the Colours!!!!!

**ohiopiper** · 4th January 12, 11:20 PM

Condemned? I never got my blindfold and cigarrette. Where do I go to lodge a complaint?

I must admit, I find a strange fascination with trying to understand the mindset that is so fascinated with what another person wears (or doesn't) as undergarments. Some religious groups have special undergarments. So? Some people go "commando" under a pair of Levis. So?

I just don't get it, yet I'm strangely drawn by the notion that I can figure what makes them tick. Maybe it's just because I'm intrigued by weird people.