-
soldiers or posers?
These two photos just came up on Ebay.
They're listed as being Scottish soldiers. What do you see?
The first thing that jumps out is that their Glengarries aren't of the Argylls pattern (while the sporran, kilt, and hosetops are). But there were so many territorial/volunteer/overseas battalions with uniform that didn't quite match that of the parent regiment that "wrong" Glengarries isn't in itself proof that these men aren't soldiers.
Then I note that both men are wearing their sporrans the same way, and not the way a Highland soldier would wear them, too high and going over the jacket, saying "see me?"
The thing that clinches it is the way the diced hosetops are being worn. No Highland soldier would put them on like that, with the dicing all ahoo. And where are their flashes?
Both photos are stamped Morrison's Studios/137 Leith St Edinburgh and 21 Promenade Portobello.
Yes I'm sure they're not Highland soldiers, but young men, perhaps English or American soldiers on leave, taking tourist "play dress-up" photos.
Last edited by OC Richard; 8th June 15 at 03:54 AM.
Proud Mountaineer from the Highlands of West Virginia; son of the Revolution and Civil War; first Europeans on the Guyandotte
-
The Following User Says 'Aye' to OC Richard For This Useful Post:
-
No expert at all - but the tunic is not cut away for the sporran, the kilt is crooked - perhaps too large? Belt buckle not centred.
The second button of the tunic is dark - covered over to indicate mourning?
Anne the Pleater :ootd:
I presume to dictate to no man what he shall eat or drink or wherewithal he shall be clothed."
-- The Hon. Stuart Ruaidri Erskine, The Kilt & How to Wear It, 1901.
-
-
-
The Following User Says 'Aye' to OC Richard For This Useful Post:
-
The fit of the second jacket is terrible through the shoulders. The QM would make sure the shoulders fit and the soldier would have to hem sleeves as needed. Notice both sets of sleeves are not the correct length.
The kilts are both the wrong size and therefore cannot hang properly on either man. Hose, belt, and sporran, etc., are all put on sloppily.
They are holding their sticks incorrectly.
You are probably right about these being studio shots of wanna be soldiers.
-
-
The black covering was - unfortunately - a common sight during the Great War, indicating that the man had lost family or a close friend.
Anne the Pleater :ootd:
I presume to dictate to no man what he shall eat or drink or wherewithal he shall be clothed."
-- The Hon. Stuart Ruaidri Erskine, The Kilt & How to Wear It, 1901.
-
The Following User Says 'Aye' to Pleater For This Useful Post:
-
The clothing is probably all legitimate even if the 'soldiers' aren't.
Thank you for the confirmation about the black button, Anne. It makes me wonder if anyone at the 'photo shoot' knew the significance of that black button.
We'll never know.
-
-
I think they are Early WW1 Soldiers, The huge increase in manpower meant there was a great shortage of uniforms and weapons (as there was at the start of WW2).
This could be temporary uniforms, issued for the first few days / weeks.
Or even new recruits not yet issued with uniforms, nipping down to the local photographers studio for a photo to be sent home to mum and dad.
I see no reason for not thinking they are soldiers, unless they were rejected, but don't want Mum and Dad to know!
The Village I used to live in on the edge of Salisbury plain had from around 1905 till post WW2 a photographers' premises, specialising in Military photographs, on the Railway station approach road so photographs were taken as they marched in!
Looking at photos of Soldiers of that period, the fit and " pressing" of a uniform even before WW1 was so poor as to get a soldier charged in modern times.
The station is at the top of the slope, as the London Scottish are marching down the slope in 1907, the Photographers is the tin shed on their left, the first pub is just to their right under the hotel, this Photograph would have been touted around for the troops within hours of their arrival along with invites to the studio.
Notice ( if my first attempt at a photograph comes out) at the time they are wearing Slouch hats (AKA Austrailian Bush Hat)which were adopted during the Boer War. So hats can change!!
And Notice!! The ladies watching the Kilts!
"We make a living by what we get, but we make a life by what we give"
Sir Winston Leonard Spencer-Churchill
-
The Following User Says 'Aye' to The Q For This Useful Post:
-
Many people in the UK would have known the significance - I believe that there were perhaps 2 or 3 dozen 'thankful villages' found after the war ended, when the government was organising the war memorials. Almost every parish began to gather the details of their dead, but in just a few places they put up a plaque to give thanks for the return of all the men who went to fight.
Anne the Pleater :ootd:
I presume to dictate to no man what he shall eat or drink or wherewithal he shall be clothed."
-- The Hon. Stuart Ruaidri Erskine, The Kilt & How to Wear It, 1901.
-
-
and even fewer Twice Thankful villages after both World wars, the men marching down the slope will turn to the left at the bottom of the hill and march off to the encampment about a mile away, but nearly at that Junction is the spot where the War memorial is today, with names from both wars.
I doubt few of those men in the picture made it to 1918...
"We make a living by what we get, but we make a life by what we give"
Sir Winston Leonard Spencer-Churchill
-
-
8th June 15, 12:36 PM
#10
My grandfather, born 1892 went to enlist, but he was so small - about 4ft 9in tall and very slightly built - that he was sent home.
Anne the Pleater :ootd:
I presume to dictate to no man what he shall eat or drink or wherewithal he shall be clothed."
-- The Hon. Stuart Ruaidri Erskine, The Kilt & How to Wear It, 1901.
-
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks