|
-
30th November 25, 04:19 PM
#1
Fly Plaid at Burns Supper?
Hello everyone,
I can't find a definite answer on the internet so I thought I would ask here. Next month, I'm attending a Burns supper. Would it be looked down upon if I wear a fly plaid with my PC? Possibly thinking primary using it just for photos and remove it once I sit down and have dinner. I will be attending as a guest and not a part of the event.
Many Thanks!
-
-
30th November 25, 10:18 PM
#2
If you want to wear a fly plaid then do so. However, many from the "old school" of thinking, on this side of the Atlantic would consider it to be rather excessive, unnecessary and frankly, a damn nuisance. I think many outwith Scotland tend to want to go rather "over the top" with their attire for that particular occasion and unfortunately many have followed suit over here for the event, I think encouraged by the kilt hire industry.
Many who wear the kilt are unaware, or don't appear to grasp that a tweed kilt jacket is the equivalent of a suit in Saxon terms and as such a drop down tie would be the normal choice. At a guess more tweed kilt jackets will be worn on Burns night in Scotland, than all the other versions of kilt jackets lumped together. Yes of course there will be formal Burns do's as well which will be black tie events, but they will be in the minority.
Last edited by Jock Scot; 1st December 25 at 05:17 AM.
Reason: added an after thought.
" Rules are for the guidance of wise men and the adherence of idle minds and minor tyrants". Field Marshal Lord Slim.
-
The Following 9 Users say 'Aye' to Jock Scot For This Useful Post:
-
1st December 25, 07:14 AM
#3
My understanding of dress etiquette is that plaids are appropriate but optional for black and white tie. So, if the event’s dress code is black tie, then it’s up to your preference, I think.
However, like Jock Scot, I’m of the view that plaids are an annoyance and, personally, prefer to minimize my accessorization in highland wear.
The Burns Suppers I’ve attended in California have been “black tie optional.” I always notice a mix of Prince Charlies and black Argyles with a smattering of random doublets, plus a contingent of guys in “Saxon” tuxedos and suits.
-
-
1st December 25, 07:32 AM
#4
A fly plaid should only be worn when the dress code is either black tie or white tie with a PC or a doublet.
In addition to this, I would only wear one if I were in some sort of “lead” position at said event (the groom at a wedding, the Master of Ceremonies at a Burns Night or the presenter addressing the haggis). They are dramatic and make you stand out. However, most (not all) of the time this isn’t a good thing.
I have had one for 20 years and can count on one hand the amount of times I have worn mine (and one of those was a time as a model when I was asked to wear full formal highland attire!)
They are also challenging, but not impossible, to dance in.
Given that you are just attending the event, even if it is a formal one, I’d leave the fly plaid at home.
I hope you have a wonderful time at your Burns Night!
-See it there, a white plume
Over the battle - A diamond in the ash
Of the ultimate combustion-My panache
Edmond Rostand
-
The Following 2 Users say 'Aye' to Panache For This Useful Post:
-
1st December 25, 08:02 AM
#5
As a former RSCDS dancer yes indeed I never wore accessories such as plaid, sgian, or dirk when dancing was likely to happen.
I've always been interested in history in general and the history of Highland Dress in particular and thus I take the long view on things.
Like any other form of fashion Highland Dress has gone through multiple stages of evolution with things going in and out of style at various points in time.
Formal Highland Dress had a quite large set of traditional accessories and throughout the 19th century it wasn't uncommon to see a gent wearing most or all of them when going out for an evening do.
The wearing of accessories was beginning to peter out in Edwardian times but World War One put the final kybosh on nearly all of them. By the 1920s men generally dressed for evening without the old accessories, which were
Dirk & dirk belt
Sword & sword belt
Plaid & plaid-brooch
pair of all-steel Highland pistols
Powder-horn
Sgian
with only the Sgian sometimes seen.
And so Highland Dress has stayed, as Jock Scott pointed out.
With my Historian's eye when somebody appears wearing even part of the Victorian panoply of accessories it seems like a Victorian costume rather than modern Highland Dress.
Here's a comparison of c1905 Evening Dress and the de-accessorised Evening Dress of the post-WWI period which is still in vogue today.

Here at left is a Victorian gent in full Evening Dress showing every possible accessory, and at right a gent around WWI showing far fewer accessories. Note that tartan or diced full hose, and buckled shoes, are still considered required. (Notice the right-hand gent is not wearing the Prince Charlie coatee, which was new at that time and considered only suitable for young men. Older gents were recommended to wear the traditional Doublet, which he is. Of course the left-hand gent isn't wearing the coatee as it wasn't yet invented.)
Last edited by OC Richard; 3rd December 25 at 09:11 AM.
Proud Mountaineer from the Highlands of West Virginia; son of the Revolution and Civil War; first Europeans on the Guyandotte
-
The Following User Says 'Aye' to OC Richard For This Useful Post:
-
1st December 25, 09:13 AM
#6
-
The Following User Says 'Aye' to Jock Scot For This Useful Post:
-
1st December 25, 09:14 AM
#7
 Originally Posted by OC Richard
Note that the only thing that distinguishes an ordinary gent's outfit and an ordinary piper's outfit is the style of doublet. (The wearing of Glengarries was quite common among civilians in Victorian times.)
Is it possibly relevant that the very notion of a Burns Supper is based on the "immortal memory" of an event first held in 1801?
Would not accessorization of one's dress for the evening in a manner that might have been appropriate for THOSE times be just as appropriate as modern highland dress?
And, as a corollary obervation (and honest question) is it not the case that many of us in the diaspora have the BRITISH Royalty during their visits to Scotland as the most indelible images on which to base our concepts of contemporary kilted attire? (seconded, or perhaps even surpassed by images of pipers marching in bands?
Richard, are you aware of any images made from people who actually ATTENDED early Burns Suppers?
(I'm generally curious and uninformed, rather than attempting to advance a proposal here).
-
-
5th December 25, 02:31 AM
#8
 Originally Posted by jlove
Hello everyone,
I can't find a definite answer on the internet so I thought I would ask here. Next month, I'm attending a Burns supper. Would it be looked down upon if I wear a fly plaid with my PC? Possibly thinking primary using it just for photos and remove it once I sit down and have dinner. I will be attending as a guest and not a part of the event.
Many Thanks!
Highland dress is subject to the same rules of style and taste as any, and, as Hardy Amies correctly advised us, a man should look as if he has '...bought his clothes with intellegence, put them on with care, and then forgotten all about them.'
For intellegence, we can read taste, understanding and discretion.
Whilst no longer considered and essential part of Highland dress, the plaid is like no other garment - and if chosen with intellegence and put on with care, it can lift a kilt outfit to an agreeably higher degree with its romentic dash and elegance. But it is a difficult thing to forget all about.
The fly-plaid is often scorned, and has been described in print as a scrappy bit of rag - quite unfairly, in my view. However, the more material in a plaid, the better it looks, and most fly-plaids that I have seen appear too skimpy and so open to scorn.
For a smart evening dinner such as a Burns' Night, a plaid is perfectly proper and they are often seen with a Prince Charlie doublet. But it should be remembered that a plaid is an over-garment worn instead of a top-coat, so one with enough material to do its job is better, both practically and in appearace, than the small, square fly-plaid.
What you might call a 'full-plaid' of about three and a half yards length can be worn in a number of ways, and is taken off easily when sitting at table or when dancing.
You mention wearing a fly-plaid essentially for its posing-for-photos effect, which no-one could really object to, but if the look of a plaid is wanted, the full-plaid is by far much better. The wrapped across the body piper-style is awkward with an open doublet like a Prince Charlie, so having it folded in what people now call 'laird style' and carried casually over the left shoulder is more authentic, and can be arrange to show a cascade of tartan if that is your aim.
Removing the plaid and draping it over the back of your chair is both the careful and intellegent thing to do after the photos have been taken and the soup is being served, and you can then forget all about it until the end of the evening. This is when you find yourself running through the rain to find your car, and the benefit of a full-plaid is obvious - both to you and your lady who gets wrapped-up cosily at your side.
-
-
5th December 25, 07:23 AM
#9
Here's the thing I put together a while back to try to explain the somewhat confusing plaid situation.
Proud Mountaineer from the Highlands of West Virginia; son of the Revolution and Civil War; first Europeans on the Guyandotte
-
-
5th December 25, 08:27 AM
#10
 Originally Posted by OC Richard
Here's the thing I put together a while back to try to explain the somewhat confusing plaid situation.

It might be useful to add a Drummer's Plaid to this montage to show the comparison.
-
Tags for this Thread
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks