X Marks the Scot - An on-line community of kilt wearers.
-
31st August 11, 11:18 AM
#11
![Quote](http://www.xmarksthescot.com/forum/images/misc/quote_icon.png) Originally Posted by Gradatim Vincemus
4) The Kilt does not cease to be a kilt because it is worn outwith Scotland, or by other than a Scot or someone descended from the Scottish diaspora.
That is my opinion as well, I was simply commenting on the wording of the entry for "kilt" in Webster's dictionary, which implies that it is a kilt because it is worn in Scotland or in the military rather than saying that it is often worn in Scotland and in the military.
![Quote](http://www.xmarksthescot.com/forum/images/misc/quote_icon.png) Originally Posted by Gradatim Vincemus
1) Offence may be too strong a word, but certainly while I can feel offended by some because that is their clear intent, I may feel only mild irritation with others that don't know any better.
Like you, I don't see any reason to take offense. To most people, the day-to-day thing closest to a kilt is a skirt, and, to me at least, the kilt falls pretty squarely into the "skirt" category. This does nothing to diminish either my sense of masculinity or to change the kilt's rightful place as a man's garment.
I think I've made my non-confrontational nature on these things pretty clear in other threads, but if somebody says "Nice skirt!" I thank them and assume they're ignorant of what it should be called. If they are insulting, I ignore them. The corrections and snide remarks don't come out unless they persistent enough to make it impossible for me to ignore them.
Last edited by Cygnus; 31st August 11 at 11:25 AM.
-
Similar Threads
-
By NewEnglander in forum General Kilt Talk
Replies: 3
Last Post: 25th October 10, 02:11 PM
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks