-
15th August 13, 09:12 PM
#7
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/01fa0/01fa01748f66dbe7e358dcbfdd626e558c8dec22" alt="Quote" Originally Posted by Jock Scot
If the normal course of events takes place then my dear wife will be faced with that exact question. She was born into a Clan, married into another Clan became a widow, re-married into another Clan and convention says that until she chooses to re-marry, then she will keep my surname and thus, she will wear my tartan, as a widow, if she chooses. However, there are, as far as I am aware, no hard and fast rules here and I do know of one widow that reverted back to her maiden name, as there were no children to consider.
Another example, Jock: my wife is Swiss, married into a clan, divorced from that clan, recovered her 'maiden' name, married into another clan (mine), retained her maiden name but took on all the other trappings and traditions of my family. If she chooses to marry again after my death she may, in Highland tradition, choose to retain her maiden name, take my name into her new marriage or take her new husband's name. I'm sure that's not confusing for you, but it will be for others, I'm equally sure.
The basis is that in Highland culture a woman is herself, first, and the wife of her husband second. On many an old stone we see such as "Mary Sutherland relict of William Munro, tenant at ...." Leaving out the 21C connotation of 'relict' this stone tells us that Mary, who lies here, was not only the wife of William Munro, a tenant farmer in the locale, but also a Sutherland.
-
The Following User Says 'Aye' to ThistleDown For This Useful Post:
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks