X Marks the Scot - An on-line community of kilt wearers.

   X Marks Partners - (Go to the Partners Dedicated Forums )
USA Kilts website Celtic Croft website Celtic Corner website Houston Kiltmakers

User Tag List

Results 1 to 10 of 53

Threaded View

  1. 8th September 14, 04:39 PM #3
    BadenochWolf's Avatar
    BadenochWolf
    BadenochWolf is offline
    Join Date
    11th December 08
    Location
    Boston, Massachusetts, USA
    Posts
    129
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Nathan View Post
    I not a fan of either if that helps.

    Honestly though, I think the pith helmet is an idiosyncratic choice but it was worn by kilted regiments. The pseudo jacobite shirt is the product of Hollywood imagination. It leads people to incorrectly deduce that the kilt was worn this way in a bygone era. Just my thoughts.
    You just cut to the heart of the issue for me: the pith helmet was a part of a military uniform in previous generations, but not civilian dress. Why is one ahistorical affectation bad and the other not?

  2. The Following User Says 'Aye' to BadenochWolf For This Useful Post:

    Nathan
« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Forum Rules

» Log in

User Name:

Password:

Not a member yet?
Register Now!

» XMarks Advertisers

Barb Tewksbury website
Renaissance Leather website
Xmarks advertising information
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.0