X Marks the Scot - An on-line community of kilt wearers.
|
-
12th February 08, 11:35 AM
#10
 Originally Posted by Phil
OK Alan, that means my father-in-law's kilt costing $15.14 in 1950 would now cost $130.38 in 2007. That seems an even better deal to me.
Fifteen bucks for a kilt? Did he buy it used? Was it wartime surplus?
-
Similar Threads
-
By ian in forum Kilts in the Media
Replies: 2
Last Post: 20th August 07, 12:20 PM
-
By Brian F in forum Kilt Advice
Replies: 4
Last Post: 6th June 07, 04:46 AM
-
By Kilted KT in forum General Kilt Talk
Replies: 18
Last Post: 7th August 06, 01:24 PM
-
By James in forum General Kilt Talk
Replies: 9
Last Post: 1st August 05, 06:41 AM
-
By Graham in forum General Kilt Talk
Replies: 20
Last Post: 25th May 04, 10:02 AM
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks