
Originally Posted by
Scotus
Am I the only one in this forum that understands their policy and agrees with it?
I'm sure that you're not the only one. But I disagree with you. I would be rather offended if some bouncer denied me access to a pub because I was wearing a kilt, in the way I wear it. I really can't imagine that they would for a second ask any female patrons about wearing/not wearing panties under a skirt.
I'm used to the question by curious bystanders, people who aren't used to the kilt, etc.; but from an establishment? Red flag. Unless I'm exposing myself to people, then who cares what I wear under the kilt?
Maybe the comparison to apartheid is a bit of a stretch, but where do you draw the line? If a black kilted german man with one leg and face tattoos exposed himself in a bar, who would you prohibit entry to? Black men, Germans, disabled people, people with tats? I think that is a very valid question.
The Barry
"Confutatis maledictis, flammis acribus addictis;
voca me cum benedictis." -"Dies Irae" (Day of Wrath)
Bookmarks