Originally Posted by
CMcG
The leather kilt sans sporran definitely takes the rest of the outfit squarely out of the traditional. Looks good!
Originally Posted by
Jock Scot
With or without the sporran the leather kilt in question, in my humble opinion, cannot in any way be described as traditional.For a start it has a pocket! Come on chaps don't let our already slipping standards slip any more! Nice it may be, modern it is, historical maybe, traditional never! I think that the OP should be congratulated for being realistic.
Please let us not complicate things even more by using, yet another, heading of "semi-traditional", whatever that is supposed to mean.
Sorry for not being clear enough Jock. I meant that the rest of his outfit still looks rather traditional. I agree that the leather kilt instantly makes it modern. That was in fact my point. By changing one item, an otherwise traditional outfit is made modern
- Justitia et fortitudo invincibilia sunt
- An t'arm breac dearg
Bookmarks