X Marks the Scot - An on-line community of kilt wearers.

   X Marks Partners - (Go to the Partners Dedicated Forums )
USA Kilts website Celtic Croft website Celtic Corner website Houston Kiltmakers

User Tag List

Results 1 to 10 of 71

Threaded View

  1. #10
    Join Date
    24th March 08
    Location
    the Highlands of Central Oregon
    Posts
    1,141
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by TheBlueCow View Post
    I think that maybe the point being made by the OP is that current fashion of kilts, while indeed fashion and not tradition, is still contributing to the preservation of the tradition. A tradition must evolve in order to continue to exist, else it come to an end and become historical.
    I don't think we know what makes a tradition durable or what will affect it over time. I don't think that we can say....with the best of intentions, with the most optimistic anticipation....if, or what, fashions will be folded into the mix that is a tradition. I suspect, that at best, it is projecting. Projecting our own hopes and desires. At worst, it's just living in a fantasy world.

    Looking back at human history...at what I know of cultures and society and human nature...I don't believe, or see any evidence, that a tradition has to evolve to be a tradition. All it has to do is be respected and valued enough to be carried on by the next generation.

    There's a striking parallel here that the folks over inthe Historical Kilt sub-forum recognize very well: many folks are not happy with history the way it is...the way it actually played out...as opposed to the way they wish it had played out. They want so badly to believe that William Wallace wore a kilt that they refuse to accept the evidence that kilts were not worn or known until hundreds of years after he was born and died. Their mental image is so firmly anchored in fantasy that no amount of scholarly research, no lack of even fragmentary evidence, will deter them.

    I don't understand it, myself.

    I don't know what glamour or cachet that "Tradition"--the word itself--brings such that people will deliberately misconstrue the English language to bestow some form of legitimacy on their choices.

    So what if wearing a MUG is not Traditional? So what if by some lights a MUG isn't even a real kilt? So what? It is what it is.

    If a person derives pleasure or a feeling of comfort...even metaphysical comfort...from wearing a denim kilt or a leather kilt or even white hose (a metaphor not an example), who is to gainsay them?

    But it's not Tradition/Traditional.

    And to try to make it so...to pilfer respect from an association that doesn't really exist...is to weaken the whole notion that MUGs have a legitimacy of their own apart from some form of iconoclasm/heterodoxy.


    --
    Last edited by DWFII; 5th July 11 at 07:20 AM.
    DWFII--Traditionalist and Auld Crabbit
    In the Highlands of Central Oregon

Similar Threads

  1. TRADITION: let's (re)define it.
    By CMcG in forum Traditional Kilt Wear
    Replies: 121
    Last Post: 2nd July 11, 07:36 PM
  2. Freedom in Tradition
    By CMcG in forum Traditional Kilt Wear
    Replies: 56
    Last Post: 9th December 10, 09:13 AM
  3. Tradition?
    By Tetley in forum General Kilt Talk
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 2nd March 10, 07:23 AM
  4. Value vs. Tradition
    By ChubRock in forum Kilt Advice
    Replies: 33
    Last Post: 21st August 09, 03:50 PM
  5. How old is a tradition?
    By Alan H in forum General Kilt Talk
    Replies: 30
    Last Post: 24th September 07, 04:07 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

» Log in

User Name:

Password:

Not a member yet?
Register Now!
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.0