Quote Originally Posted by Ancienne Alliance View Post
Sorry if I've offended you. Really I was light years from intending to do so.

Please notice that I didn't insult your choice, because, as you are explaining it, you didn't have the choice due to your financial situation.
I just wanted to make it clear for you and the sake of everybody else on this forum, that these kilts are dangerous and the labelling a scandal if not a hoax.

“Bum around in a kilt ?” OK. Fair enough... I see that we simply do not have the same approach to the kilt, and from now on I'll let you live your kilted life as you intend to.

The thing is though, you can't be to thin skinned when you use the term “tank” to describe these kilts and ask who is the kilt maker. You have to take responsibility for your posts and the answers you'll get.


Best,

Robert
Perhaps you should re-read my first and last post again, sir. I never referred to the pictured kilt as a "tank". Excepting the fact that I think it's a stupid name, I do know the difference. I may not be a regular poster, but I've been around long enough to know the basics. And I HAVE taken responsibility for my post. I pointed out that I respect one's right to criticize in an open forum, but also respectfully disagree.

If I'm thinned skinned, okay. As I said, perhaps I've learned a valuable lesson today. I thought this was a place where people with a common interest could share that common interest without harsh judgment. Thanks for clearing that misunderstanding up for me.