Quote Originally Posted by gpmeakin View Post
Not singling you out CDNSushi, yours is just the most recent one I've seen.
My question - How much freedom do we need?
Even though Kilted Cole replied to your question aptly, since you addressed it to me, I thought I would also answer...

Bearing in mind that I have no qualms about wearing something underneath my kilt (and those who read my postings know that I don't give a toss who knows -- it's no secret)... Black, silk boxers are the best I've found, but that's not the point. The point is, when many people (myself included) use the word "freedom," we are referring to having fabric between our legs, creating a barrier of cloth between them. Even silk boxers are attached at the bottom, and it just FEELS different than if that bit of fabric is not there.

Now, I very much like the feel of having nothing but air down there, but realistically I am not willing to do so, for the same reasons that I and others have given both in this thread and others... Hygiene is certainly one, but also, I can't say I exactly LIKE the feel of wool on my bare skin. And I know I'm not the only one who feels that way, because if it were so, wool underwear would be common. Yikes!

That's why the option of some kind of silky, yet unbifurcated underkilt seems like the most reasonable option without resorting to some non-sequitur options, like say... wearing a thong, which may be an option for SOME, (many women are either used to or comfortable wearing them but many men would never ever consider it), or a C-string (which is almost the same thing, PLUS it's a very new concept/item of clothing -- the comfort and practicality of which may be questionable.. But yes, they DO make men's models), or one of those novelty ummm... pouches that occasionally get posted here as a cross-link from someone's eBay auction. Either way, all of these "options" fall squarely into the "questionable" column for most, mainstream kilt wearers.