|
-
29th December 12, 10:19 AM
#1
North America (and the USA in particular) tends to be a place where relaxation of standards seems to be the norm, and as those standards are relaxed, somebody decides to relax them even more in a never-ending cycle that can only result in people wandering about in the buff (okay, so that's a bit of an exaggeration, but I hope you can see what I'm saying). In the not-too-distant past, and in the present in some locales, a collared shirt, tie, and tweed suit are what is worn by outdoorsmen when shooting, fishing, etc. It's actually a look that I much prefer to the ubiquitous camouflage and bright orange so common around here. It's also quite likely that your father/grandfather wore a suit and tie nearly everywhere he went, so it's not as if the age of manners and "gentlemanly" dress are that far behind us.
In my opinion, there is nothing wrong with doing something because you've been taught that's how it's done - that is tradition. It doesn't mean you should blindly follow everything you read here or elsewhere, but it doesn't hurt to be aware of what is considered proper and traditional before modifying it to suit your own taste.
Taking it back to kilts, most of what constitutes traditional highland attire comes from the recent era of suits and ties, so "casual" dress still includes a tie and jacket, as does traditional "hunting" dress. There are many on the forum that prefer this style, despite the fact that many of our T-shirt-clad friends and fellow X-Markers consider it a bit antiquated. If that isn't your style, by all means, wear a pullover, T-Shirt, combat boots, etc. with your kilt. It is yours, after all.
Last edited by Cygnus; 29th December 12 at 10:20 AM.
-
-
29th December 12, 10:38 AM
#2
 Originally Posted by Cygnus
North America (and the USA in particular) tends to be a place where relaxation of standards seems to be the norm, and as those standards are relaxed, somebody decides to relax them even more in a never-ending cycle that can only result in people wandering about in the buff (okay, so that's a bit of an exaggeration, but I hope you can see what I'm saying). In the not-too-distant past, and in the present in some locales, a collared shirt, tie, and tweed suit are what is worn by outdoorsmen when shooting, fishing, etc. It's actually a look that I much prefer to the ubiquitous camouflage and bright orange so common around here. It's also quite likely that your father/grandfather wore a suit and tie nearly everywhere he went, so it's not as if the age of manners and "gentlemanly" dress are that far behind us.
In my opinion, there is nothing wrong with doing something because you've been taught that's how it's done - that is tradition. It doesn't mean you should blindly follow everything you read here or elsewhere, but it doesn't hurt to be aware of what is considered proper and traditional before modifying it to suit your own taste.
Taking it back to kilts, most of what constitutes traditional highland attire comes from the recent era of suits and ties, so "casual" dress still includes a tie and jacket, as does traditional "hunting" dress. There are many on the forum that prefer this style, despite the fact that many of our T-shirt-clad friends and fellow X-Markers consider it a bit antiquated. If that isn't your style, by all means, wear a pullover, T-Shirt, combat boots, etc. with your kilt. It is yours, after all.
I entirely agree Cygnus! In all these things there is a place for common sense to be a consideration. I do baulk at the idea that wearing well cut quality clothing is somehow elitist or showy. I was always taught that style and fashion are only distantly related. I have known people with modest means who have plenty of the former and who couldn't care less for the latter. I have also known people with more money than sense spend significant sums on poor quality ill fitting clothes that have certain labels but will look ridiculously dated in five years time. Such common sense considerations of style over fashion generally fit with Highland attire (IMHO). However, to each their own I suppose
-
-
29th December 12, 10:54 AM
#3
Historical context is always important. There was a time in the UK when men and women always wore a hat out of doors. When men, if they were a member of one of the Institutions, would always wear the appropriate tie to work. But times have moved on and now only wear the tie, or the special jacket, or the hood on those annual occasions.
The thing is with photographs - they don't automatically update themselves.
Regards
Chas
-
-
31st December 12, 05:11 PM
#4
Happy New Year, everyone. Although I live in the US, I figure that the only way I can celebrate the New Year and still get to bed when my internal clock says I should, is to turn on the BBC World Service and listen to Big Ben bring in the new year (7:00 EST).
-
-
1st January 13, 12:54 AM
#5
I'll wear waterproof waders up to my chest when standing in a trout stream in the Eastern Sierras, thank you very much. I might well wear a tie with them if I so choose! But that's one occasion for which I shan't go kilted.
-
-
2nd January 13, 06:13 AM
#6
 Originally Posted by Peter Crowe
I entirely agree Cygnus! In all these things there is a place for common sense to be a consideration. I do baulk at the idea that wearing well cut quality clothing is somehow elitist or showy. I was always taught that style and fashion are only distantly related. I have known people with modest means who have plenty of the former and who couldn't care less for the latter. I have also known people with more money than sense spend significant sums on poor quality ill fitting clothes that have certain labels but will look ridiculously dated in five years time. Such common sense considerations of style over fashion generally fit with Highland attire (IMHO). However, to each their own I suppose 
***
I couldn't agree more, Peter! Well said, mate.
Cheers,
-
-
5th January 13, 06:24 AM
#7
I, too, will applaud Peter's comments. While I admire the style and fortitude of those who wear a coat and tie for
shooting and fishing, the south Georgia swamps and woods I rambled in as a child would make short work of such
attire, and I would not have survived the wrath of my dear mother for such destruction. My grandfather wore
overhalls (that, of course, is the correct spelling based on proper pronunciation where I grew up) when following a
mule growing up, but upon becoming the owner of the farm, excuse me - plantation, moved into a three-piece suit
for the remainder of his days, and like his father-in-law strode the fields in, as we say here, wingtips or brogued ankle
boots. Even when it was 110 Fahrenheit in the shade, with 85-100% humidity. Not for me.
Although in my defense, I have been seen on top of a ladder making emergency repairs or adjustments on opening
nights while wearing suits that would be 1500 - 2000 dollars today. Need occasionally has to override common sense.
-
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks