X Marks the Scot - An on-line community of kilt wearers.
|
-
22nd June 13, 01:41 PM
#1
I sometimes have to wear an orange hat with it.
The orange gear is part of a uniform so the "rules" of civilian highland wear don't apply. At least in my opinion.
And yes 1'500$ seems about what you will pay for a chunk of kilt caboodle. Then some people spend that and much more on a watch that is in essence the same as a 70$ swatch in a metall shell.
Compared to that Highland wear does seem more reasonable to me.
-
-
23rd June 13, 01:24 AM
#2
It is a significant investment - the kilt alone is the most expensive garment I've ever purchased. But, I wanted the Cunningham tartan, and, perhaps with a few alterations, it should last me a lifetime. At will be far more of a conversation piece than a nice watch....
Last edited by andycwb; 23rd June 13 at 01:25 AM.
-
-
23rd June 13, 09:18 AM
#3
Even a more modest kilt is quite an investment...plus a sporran, hose, and garters. One thing's for sure--a kilted man is often the most expensively-dressed man in any given room. My kikt was my first made-to-measure garment to boot!
The Official [BREN]
-
-
23rd June 13, 09:56 AM
#4
 Originally Posted by TheOfficialBren
Even a more modest kilt is quite an investment...plus a sporran, hose, and garters. One thing's for sure--a kilted man is often the most expensively-dressed man in any given room. My kikt was my first made-to-measure garment to boot!

How right you are, exchange rates back in the day made my cheap HoS kilt to my most expensive garement. It's been overtaken now, but is still in the top 3.
-
-
23rd June 13, 10:10 AM
#5
Darn those exchange rates!! An attractive price can quickly become a frustrating one.
The Official [BREN]
-
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks