|
-
13th August 13, 09:26 AM
#1
 Originally Posted by unixken
If that that is 'is' is that that is not 'not is', is that that is 'not is' that that is not 'is'?
Formally (syntactically) yes, whether the meaning of 'is' is an is of attribution (material implication) or is an is of identity (bi-conditional) because “that that is 'is' is that that is not 'not is' if and only if that that is 'not is' is that that is not 'is'” -- otherwise known as the “Law of Transposition.” However, informally (semantically) it all depends on what the meanings of all the is’s are and especially if the ‘is not’ is an is not of specific denial or an is not of nothingness and hence semantically open to a fallacy of ambiguity (equivocation). At least that’s my take on it as a student of nothing!
-
The Following User Says 'Aye' to O'Searcaigh For This Useful Post:
-
13th August 13, 10:01 AM
#2
Sometimes an is is just an is.
-
The Following User Says 'Aye' to McElmurry For This Useful Post:
-
13th August 13, 03:28 PM
#3
 Originally Posted by O'Searcaigh
Formally (syntactically) yes, whether the meaning of ' is' is an is of attribution (material implication) or is an is of identity (bi-conditional) because “that that is ' is' is that that is not ' not is' if and only if that that is ' not is' is that that is not ' is'” -- otherwise known as the “ Law of Transposition.” However, informally (semantically) it all depends on what the meanings of all the is’s are and especially if the ‘is not’ is an is not of specific denial or an is not of nothingness and hence semantically open to a fallacy of ambiguity (equivocation). At least that’s my take on it as a student of nothing! 
You SO just reminded me of the "Romans, go home!" scene, from "The Life of Brian". LOL
Last edited by unixken; 13th August 13 at 03:29 PM.
KEN CORMACK
Clan Buchanan
U.S. Coast Guard, Retired
Cuyahoga Falls, Ohio, USA
-
-
13th August 13, 06:14 PM
#4
Might be interesting to know when the cat's birthday is, eh? Don't have to worry about the second date on his tombstone since nobody will ever know until somebody gets up the guts to open the darned box.
-
-
14th August 13, 06:38 AM
#5

Cats in boxes....not sure I approve of that!
-
-
19th August 13, 07:53 AM
#6
 Originally Posted by KD Burke

Cats in boxes....not sure I approve of that!
Me neither!

(a belated post, owing to problems uploading photos as threaded in the Tech forum)
Proudly Duncan [maternal], MacDonald and MacDaniel [paternal].
-
-
19th August 13, 11:24 AM
#7
To paraphrase Groucho Marx: What the cat was doing in my boxers, I'll never know!
And to think all those years, I never knew Groucho was a scientist.
-
-
14th August 13, 06:54 AM
#8
 Originally Posted by unixken
Now write that 100 times before morning or... Oh yea, and what have the Romans done for us? -- love it!!!
-
-
14th August 13, 07:48 PM
#9
How many people here would not even know who Schrodinger or his cat were if not for Big Bang Theory?
I'm just trying to be the person my dog thinks I am.
-
-
15th August 13, 02:20 AM
#10
 Originally Posted by crash
How many people here would not even know who Schrodinger or his cat were if not for Big Bang Theory?
I would... I've known about Schroedinger (and his cat) since the late 1980's.
John
-
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks