X Marks the Scot - An on-line community of kilt wearers.

   X Marks Partners - (Go to the Partners Dedicated Forums )
USA Kilts website Celtic Croft website Celtic Corner website Houston Kiltmakers

User Tag List

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 41

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    13th March 05
    Location
    Victoria, British Columbia, Canada (OCONCAN)
    Posts
    3,813
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I like mine a tad shorter. I'd estimate 2 - 3 fingers below the hinge bone on the outside.
    "Touch not the cat bot a glove."

  2. The Following 2 Users say 'Aye' to Macman For This Useful Post:


  3. #2
    Join Date
    7th December 12
    Location
    western North Carolina
    Posts
    219
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Wherever you feel looks good on you, or whatever your better half thinks. But if you have to have a measurement, 2/100 of a mm is impressive to say if someone asks, and most folks haven't a clue what that means, LOL.

  4. #3
    Join Date
    24th September 04
    Location
    Victoria, BC Canada 48° 25' 47.31"N 123° 20' 4.59" W
    Posts
    4,360
    Mentioned
    18 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I chose this photo to show hose height simply because I was up on a stage so you are not seeing the parallax effect in other photos. The photographer was lower, about the height of my sporran so you are seeing everything straight on.



    I'm in the school that likes my kilts at the top of my kneecap and my hose higher than that worn in the military.

    There is a bone that you can feel just under the bottom of the kneecap and half way between the front of your leg and the side of your leg.
    The top of my hose in this picture are right under that bone. This is also one hand width under the bottom of my kneecap.

    This is higher than you see in the pic posted by MacMan above.
    Steve Ashton
    Forum Owner

  5. The Following 3 Users say 'Aye' to Steve Ashton For This Useful Post:


  6. #4
    Join Date
    4th December 11
    Location
    Utah
    Posts
    289
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I'm only 5'7" but I have big calves (16 inches), so the only thing that works for me is to put the garter right above the top of my calf muscle. That just happens to work out to Nathan's three fingers below the kneecap.

  7. #5
    Join Date
    18th August 13
    Location
    Greensboro, North Carolina, USA
    Posts
    3,580
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I like my kilt to stop at the top of my knee. I'm a runner, so I have large calves. I pull my hose up to just under my knee cap. Here's a picture --

    IMG_0269.jpg
    Allen Sinclair, FSAScot
    Eastern Region Vice President
    North Carolina Commissioner
    Clan Sinclair Association (USA)

  8. The Following User Says 'Aye' to ASinclair For This Useful Post:


  9. #6
    Join Date
    3rd July 13
    Location
    Melbourne Victoria Australia
    Posts
    153
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I'm still sort-of new, but as far as hose length I'm more or
    less forced by biology. I've got big calves -- as in 16" -- and
    the only place that works for hose tops is just above the
    bulge of the muscle. (And, FWIW, I'm about 6' and 15% body
    fat -- so they aren't going to get smaller.)


    This leaves the hose top only about 1 or 2 fingers below
    my kneecap Any lower and they'd fall down. And my
    sgian dubh would fall out.

    -Don

  10. #7
    McRoy is offline Registration void at member request
    Join Date
    30th April 14
    Location
    Calgary, Alberta, Canada
    Posts
    55
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I've always followed what I was taught in the military, two fingers below the knee bone you can feel to the side just under the kneecap. IMHO the hose pulled up to the hem of the kilt looks a tad retarded.

  11. #8
    Join Date
    7th February 11
    Location
    London, Canada
    Posts
    9,588
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by McRoy View Post
    I've always followed what I was taught in the military, two fingers below the knee bone you can feel to the side just under the kneecap. IMHO the hose pulled up to the hem of the kilt looks a tad retarded.
    As a former teacher, please: the word "retarded" is not the general word for bad things, and is rather offensive in general context.
    Rev'd Father Bill White: Mostly retired Parish Priest & former Elementary Headmaster. Lover of God, dogs, most people, joy, tradition, humour & clarity. Legion Padre, theologian, teacher, philosopher, linguist, encourager of hearts & souls & a firm believer in dignity, decency, & duty. A proud Canadian Sinclair with solid Welsh and other heritage.

  12. The Following 5 Users say 'Aye' to Father Bill For This Useful Post:


  13. #9
    Join Date
    18th October 09
    Location
    Orange County California
    Posts
    11,441
    Mentioned
    18 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Interestingly this article which talks about the Inverness Kilt Society discusses this very thing, hose height.

    In The Graphic, 9 August 1913, there is an article about the kilt (Is the Kilt in Danger?) wherein is mentioned

    The Inverness Kilt Society, aided by Lord Lovat, Lord Seafield, The MacKintosh, and Lochiel, have just drawn up rules for the correct wearing of the Highland costume.

    ...Hose are to be worn one inch higher than the centre of the calf.

    ...There should be about the width of a hand between the top of the hose and the bottom of the kilt
    .

    The main point of the article is that the kilt is losing popularity in the Highland battalions due to having too much cloth, but mainly because of the ancillary things such as spats, hosetops, and the hair sporran. The article calls for the introduction into the army of long plain hose and leather sporrans (both of which were done a year later).

    Here it is



    Note that all four of the hose illustrations show hose being worn higher than the traditional Army height. (Well, the Seaforth Highlander, 2nd from left, is very close.) When I wear my diced hosetops at the necessary height (necessary to make the correct number of diamonds appear) and my kilt around the top of the kneecap in the old way, the distance between the edge of the kilt and the top of the hose is around TWO hand-widths.

    Note in the centre photo, showing an army kilt being worn, how amazingly high the rise of the kilt is.
    Last edited by OC Richard; 6th September 14 at 05:48 AM.
    Proud Mountaineer from the Highlands of West Virginia; son of the Revolution and Civil War; first Europeans on the Guyandotte

  14. The Following 3 Users say 'Aye' to OC Richard For This Useful Post:


  15. #10
    Join Date
    15th February 12
    Location
    Seymour , Indiana
    Posts
    1,290
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    [QUOTE=Steve Ashton;1244802]I chose this photo to show hose height simply because I was up on a stage so you are not seeing the parallax effect in other photos.




    Yes , I know what you mean . I can see that kilt hose height is the focal point of the pic .
    Mike Montgomery
    Clan Montgomery Society , International

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

» Log in

User Name:

Password:

Not a member yet?
Register Now!
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.0