|
-
14th March 16, 07:21 PM
#1
 Originally Posted by kiltedcontractor
I must apologize. I did not mean to indicate that outlander has many inaccuracies. There are some minor questione re:costuming(from what ive read), ive also seen discussions that indicate a woman would never get away with some of Claire s antics. The slight shifting of witch trial dates (about 20 yrs as i understand it) is a minor infraction. Some other fictional/historical shows are abusive to history . I see that as a trend to make story lines. As much as i love Viking series, they are offenders. Rollo and Ragnar are around 100 yrs apart. There are more , this is not the forum.
I did not mean to imply you did. I'm curious as to what you did catch. Finding historical inaccuracies or continuity flaws (When the armistice is announced Claire is standing outside and given a bottle of white wine. The next shot shows her with a bottle of red wine) or those things that make me wonder what the actual history says about it.
I like Vikings (even though "viking" is a verb and not a noun. One isn't a Viking, one goes viking i.e. raiding). I'm willing to give them a bit of leeway as for the first season I fact checked and while Ragar did not do everything they portray in the movie, someone in Norse history did. Much like the setup for the Lindesfarne raid--by the era depicted in the show, the existence of England was well known to the Norse, it was just a tough slog to get over there. As to Rollo, I'd always assumed he was a fictional character like Floki et al. I know how the real Ragnar allegedly died and I'm curious as to when we're going to get to that. I've not checked them lately and the raid on Paris didn't seem quite right to me. I'll check again, maybe soon. ;)
Oh, and viking is properly pronounced "wicking." At least in Swedish and Norwegian. As I recall from that trip the Danes say, "Meh, have some schnapps!"
Last edited by freep; 14th March 16 at 07:26 PM.
Slàinte mhath!
Freep is not a slave to fashion.
Aut pax, aut bellum.
-
The Following User Says 'Aye' to freep For This Useful Post:
-
16th March 16, 03:36 PM
#2
 Originally Posted by freep
Oh, and viking is properly pronounced "wicking." At least in Swedish and Norwegian. As I recall from that trip the Danes say, "Meh, have some schnapps!"
My wife is Norwegian and she pronounces the word as vick-ing with a 'V'. Swedish, Norwegian and Danish pronunciations can be heard here: http://forvo.com/word/viking/
Last edited by Bruce Scott; 16th March 16 at 03:38 PM.
-
-
16th March 16, 05:48 PM
#3
All the Norwegians and Swedes I spoke to (and I asked most of them about viking stuff) said 'wicking.' Regional thing maybe? We were in Stockholm, Oslo and Bergen.
Slàinte mhath!
Freep is not a slave to fashion.
Aut pax, aut bellum.
-
-
23rd March 16, 01:08 PM
#4
 Originally Posted by Bruce Scott
My wife is Norwegian and she pronounces the word as vick-ing with a 'V'. Swedish, Norwegian and Danish pronunciations can be heard here: http://forvo.com/word/viking/
Listened to all the forvo pronunciations and you are correct. It is a 'v' sound, however, the whole word is pronounced not in the US English manner of VY-king but more like veek-ING, which to my ear on a casual listen causes it to sound like week-ING.
I stand corrected.
Slàinte mhath!
Freep is not a slave to fashion.
Aut pax, aut bellum.
-
The Following User Says 'Aye' to freep For This Useful Post:
-
23rd March 16, 03:17 PM
#5
Yes, Lise's pronunciation sounds very much like veek-ing to my ear.
-
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks