X Marks the Scot - An on-line community of kilt wearers.

   X Marks Partners - (Go to the Partners Dedicated Forums )
USA Kilts website Celtic Croft website Celtic Corner website Houston Kiltmakers

User Tag List

Results 1 to 10 of 19

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    21st October 21
    Location
    Memphis,Tn,USA
    Posts
    585
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Troglodyte View Post

    Everything that happened in Scottish domestic policy prior to 1603 (and prior to the Union in 1707) was carried out by Scots under the rule of their own Stewart monarchy - so the internecine sqabbling of the clans and the Scottish monarchy, their genocidal activities and proscription of specific clans (think Macgregor), and massacres like those of Glencoe were a Scot-on-Scot action.
    It was my understanding that Glencoe was largely orchestrated by the very Dutch William of Orange. Either way, still not English. I do get annoyed when people use English when they mean British. Or think all Scotland is the Highlands.

    Reference for fellow colonials:
    English: From England

    British: From the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, including England, Scotland, Wales, and Northern Ireland

    If any of the above is wrong, please correct me
    Tha mi uabhasach sgith gach latha.
    “A man should look as if he has bought his clothes (kilt) with intelligence, put them (it) on with care, and then forgotten all about them (it).” Paraphrased from Hardy Amies
    Proud member of the Clans Urquhart and MacKenzie.

  2. The Following User Says 'Aye' to kilted2000 For This Useful Post:


  3. #2
    Join Date
    8th September 24
    Location
    Kansas City, MO, USA
    Posts
    51
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by kilted2000 View Post
    I do get annoyed when people use English when they mean British. Or think all Scotland is the Highlands.
    I'm sure you wouldn't be shocked in the least to know many of the murikan's think that way. The variance of the British inflections on the English language mean nothing to many of them and result with calling it all English. I find the British linguistics rather fascinating where you can track down where a person lived solely on their accent infliction right down to their townships of origin. So much so that you can tell the difference between someone from Eastern parts of London to someone from the Northern parts of London.

    As for the Highlands... there are some really dumb people out there. 'Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.' I've run across many who think England is the "low lands" due to the placement of borders on a map. When I have asked the same group to show me all of the United Kingdom, they tend to miss out on everything that isn't the main lands encompassing England, Scotland, & Wales.

  4. The Following 2 Users say 'Aye' to spr0k3t For This Useful Post:


  5. #3
    Join Date
    14th June 21
    Location
    Strathdon, Aberdeenshire
    Posts
    646
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by kilted2000 View Post
    It was my understanding that Glencoe was largely orchestrated by the very Dutch William of Orange. Either way, still not English. I do get annoyed when people use English when they mean British. Or think all Scotland is the Highlands.

    Reference for fellow colonials:
    English: From England

    British: From the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, including England, Scotland, Wales, and Northern Ireland

    If any of the above is wrong, please correct me
    You are right. William of Orange was Dutch, but he was the grandson of Charles I and husband of Mary, who was daughter of the ousted James II - from whom we get the Jacobite following.

    William had an obvious claim to the Crown of the United Kingdom - and took it by rebellion or Glorious Revolution, according to your personal stance.

    Revolution is only the name given to a successful rebellion, but William and Mary were no less royal and Stewart than James, who was William's father-in-law.

    Complicated and awkward for all...

  6. The Following 3 Users say 'Aye' to Troglodyte For This Useful Post:


Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

» Log in

User Name:

Password:

Not a member yet?
Register Now!
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.0