X Marks the Scot - An on-line community of kilt wearers.
|
-
13th July 05, 01:33 PM
#9
 Originally Posted by Doc Hudson
Why should that be?
I know why I need a kilt longer in the back than in the front, but that is because of my big gut and big butt.
That kilts SHOULD be longer in the back than in the front is simply unfounded legend
BTW, I agree with the SW (or SWK) as an abbreviation of Stillwater Kilts, and SK for SportKilts.
It's a good general rule, I'm not going to get in a tiff over it, but the question was asked about the diff between a billion dollar outfit and a more ecomomical one. Why? It's got to do with the bend-over thing and you don't want to spoil the mystery.
-
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks