X Marks the Scot - An on-line community of kilt wearers.

   X Marks Partners - (Go to the Partners Dedicated Forums )
USA Kilts website Celtic Croft website Celtic Corner website Houston Kiltmakers

User Tag List

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 22
  1. #1
    Join Date
    27th June 05
    Location
    Altoona/State College, PA
    Posts
    504
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    New Development in Scottish "Super-Regiment" Story

    Check out this story:

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/scotland/4157274.stm
    Shameful...

  2. #2
    Miah is offline Oops, it seems this member needs to update their email address
    Join Date
    12th June 04
    Location
    Pueblo Colorado
    Posts
    530
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    well it is sad, but it happens there are many units that come and go, it is sad that the ones in the UK with such a great history have to fall into the catagory.
    Look at the ANGLICO units of the Marine Corps they have come and gone and come back again.
    I know it is not the same but it is somewhat close.

  3. #3
    macwilkin is offline
    Retired Forum Moderator
    Forum Historian

    Join Date
    22nd June 04
    Posts
    9,938
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    New regimental badge...

    Quote Originally Posted by sav
    Check out this story:

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/scotland/4157274.stm
    Shameful...
    It's the "Crucified Moose" part duex:

    http://www.britains-smallwars.com/Aden/700.htm

    Scroll about half-way down the page and you'll see the badge I'm referring to.

    Todd

  4. #4
    Join Date
    14th February 04
    Location
    Little Chute, Wisconsin
    Posts
    4,091
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    So they go from the crucified moose to the crucified cat. This is an improvement?

  5. #5
    Join Date
    27th June 05
    Location
    Altoona/State College, PA
    Posts
    504
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by bubba
    So they go from the crucified moose to the crucified cat. This is an improvement?
    Absolutely not...

  6. #6
    Join Date
    23rd January 04
    Posts
    4,682
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by cajunscot
    It's the "Crucified Moose" part duex:

    http://www.britains-smallwars.com/Aden/700.htm

    Scroll about half-way down the page and you'll see the badge I'm referring to.

    Todd
    Good slogan on the crucified Moose!

  7. #7
    macwilkin is offline
    Retired Forum Moderator
    Forum Historian

    Join Date
    22nd June 04
    Posts
    9,938
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    badge...

    Quote Originally Posted by Colin
    Good slogan on the crucified Moose!
    A tip o' the glengarry to the lads of the Argylls for that one, Colin -- they despised the badge! :mrgreen:

    T.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    23rd January 04
    Posts
    4,682
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by cajunscot
    A tip o' the glengarry to the lads of the Argylls for that one, Colin -- they despised the badge! :mrgreen:

    T.
    But as a MacKenzie, I like it just fine.

  9. #9
    macwilkin is offline
    Retired Forum Moderator
    Forum Historian

    Join Date
    22nd June 04
    Posts
    9,938
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    badge...

    Quote Originally Posted by Colin
    But as a MacKenzie, I like it just fine.
    True, Colin -- really, both badges are not "bad" looking badges per se, just the meaning behind them.

    That is the one thing I will give the Highlanders credit for -- the new badge they adopted in 1994 combined elements of the Queen's Own Highlanders (Seaforths & Camerons) and the Gordons, just as the Highlanders have used all three tartans (Cameron of Erracht, Mackenzie of Seaforth and Gordon) as part of the regimental uniform.

    Cheers,

    Todd

  10. #10
    An t-Ileach's Avatar
    An t-Ileach is offline Oops, it seems this member needs to update their email address
    Join Date
    28th June 05
    Location
    Preas a'Chiobair/Shepherd's Bush, Lunnainn/London RA/UK
    Posts
    468
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    My family has an historic involvement with the ASH (not me, I served elsewhere).

    But it struck me when the stupid idea was first mooted to amalgamate the Six that the only way to preserve the traditions and history of Scotland's soldiers was to keep at least two (not one) "big" regiments - one formed around the First of Foot and the other around the Black Watch (the Royal Highland Regiment) as they were the first regiments raised (in the Royal Scots' case in the 17th Century; and the Black Watch in the 18th).

    But many of us British ex-servicemen have had a hunch for a long time that the government is hell bent on forging a Corps of Infantry, in the long run, with numbered regiments having no local affiliations at all.

    So they'll even change the historic numbering of the surviving regiments (if any of the old ones do) - so 1st Infantry Regiment won't be the Royal Scots, 22nd won't be The Cheshire Regiment, and 42nd won't be The Black Watch. Quite why they want to do this is a moot point.

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

» Log in

User Name:

Password:

Not a member yet?
Register Now!
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.0