It might not be written down, but there is a tacit understanding when accepting commissioned rank that one will adhere to certain codes of behaviour.

That includes such things as the manner of dressing: and I well recall how just as I was required to obtain my uniforms, hats etc, from specified tailors, because my regiment required certain styles of cut, and colour. I was also required to adhere to a certain off duty dress code.

This all might seem overly restrictive to some: but it is a part of the ethos of the officer corps of any army, and oddly enough enhances the fighting ability of that army. For it is a shared thing amongst the soldiers of say a regiment, a part of what binds together first the officers, and then the other ranks.

Now such things as the adherence to an off duty/civilian attire dress code, might appear ridiculous in this day and age: but it is also linked to the very necessary discipline, which also binds a unit together when life gets too interesting.

So rather than quibbling about not being allowed to wear the kilt when as I understand it carrying out a military duty: the attitude should be of pride in holding a commission, in an army of high repute.

It is some years since I was a serving officer, but if time travel was possible-and I had to serve again: I would hope it was with an army which insisted on the preservation of such standards.

James