Quote Originally Posted by M. A. C. Newsome
Will,

That's correct. Probably just a typo in the article.
M
'92 vs '94, probably. But they specify that that date puts the tailored kilt before Rawlinson (whatever his role may have been.) I suspect that it's a matter of confusing seventeenth century and 1700s, with a couple of intermediaries before the author got the information. It does seem a pretty fair article, barring that one howler.

Will Pratt