X Marks the Scot - An on-line community of kilt wearers.

   X Marks Partners - (Go to the Partners Dedicated Forums )
USA Kilts website Celtic Croft website Celtic Corner website Houston Kiltmakers

User Tag List

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 22 of 22
  1. #21
    Join Date
    30th November 04
    Location
    Deansboro, NY
    Posts
    3,334
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    This is an interesting question. Because people's buttocks stick out and their waists nip in to the small of the back, a kilt has to cover a longer distance from the bottom to the waist at the back of the kilt than at the front. However, because a kilt is supposed to be buckled tight at the waist, the back doesn't dip when you're actually wearing the kilt. Rather, the kilt will be a little shorter _at the bottom_ in the back than in the front. I've just done a quick calc, and, for a kilt length of 24", and a butt that sticks out 2" to stern farther than the small of the back, the kilt will be 3/8" shorter in the back than in the front. In fact, we have a couple of people in our band who, shall we say, carry their weight behind the counter. Their kilts are noticeably shorter in the back than in the front for this very reason.

    But, there's really not much you can do about it. If you just raise the top band in the back, the kilt will still fit with a tartan line at the waist, and all you will have gained is a higher kilt back but the kilt will still be 3/8" too short at the bottom. If you try to make the center of the kilt actually longer in the back, the fell can't be identical on each pleat, which will look odd. And, if you cut the waist _down_ in the back, you will just make the problem worse.

    So, moral of this story, stop worrying. A kilt is really a rather primitively-constructed garment in comparison to modern garments that are made from shaped pieces of fabric. Kilts fit best on trim individuals who have straight shapes and no pot bellies. The construction technique doesn't allow for the kind of individual fit that is achieved with modern clothing patterns, even though they are custom made garments. After all, how much can you do with only 3 measurements (waist, hip, and length)??

    Barb
    Last edited by Barb T; 11th January 06 at 02:50 PM.

  2. #22
    Join Date
    3rd January 06
    Location
    Dorset, on the South coast of England
    Posts
    4,455
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Because I am 'winging it' with these kilts I am making, the waist is not stiffened, nor thinned by cutting as I want to keep the construction fluid so I can reduce the size as I lose weight.

    I wear a sturdy belt and put in two belt loops towards the back, and one on the apron.

    When I curve the centre back down and then cut the pleats level I am making the centre back about an inch longer than the sides. I add a waist band only to hold the top of the back pleats, then fold the aprons over a reinforcing strip and sew down.

    I am just a perfectionist I supose. So far as I can see the lower edges are level - another excuse for looking at my reflection.

    When I find something which will make the rest of the construction easier I tend to go for it - if the aprons are 'self banded' there is no bother matching up the pattern. The top of the back is hidden by the belt, but I can usually (so far) find a toning fabric in my stash anyway.

    I suspect that a lot of the people who have seen and claimed to be interested in the aquisition of one of my kilts would require a goodly amount of centre back dip - being 'well bustled' in build. The trick now is to find anyone interested in actually paying for one.

    If I can sell kilts I can buy more fabric - that would be good.

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

» Log in

User Name:

Password:

Not a member yet?
Register Now!
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.0