X Marks the Scot - An on-line community of kilt wearers.

   X Marks Partners - (Go to the Partners Dedicated Forums )
USA Kilts website Celtic Croft website Celtic Corner website Houston Kiltmakers

User Tag List

Page 4 of 6 FirstFirst ... 23456 LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 56
  1. #31
    Moosehead's Avatar
    Moosehead is offline Membership Revoked for repeated rule violations.
    Join Date
    7th January 06
    Location
    Prince Edward Island, Canada
    Posts
    566
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Someone come up with the slogan and we can go to print. X- marks kiltlifter briefs. Put the shame on the shamer.
    Simple: EFF OFF! One word on each cheek.

  2. #32
    Join Date
    30th November 05
    Location
    Mountains of Utah U.S.A.
    Posts
    2,903
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    The Queen

    Quote Originally Posted by arrogcow
    I have read that historically regimental = no underwear when a king is on the throne and when a queen is on the throne underwear was required, and that only applies to soldiers anyway - I don't know if thats true or not, but its not any dumber than any other rule about what you "can/can not" wear.

    What's under my kilt is my business alone.

    Adam
    Not to sure about that: (I edited the photo)



    MrBill
    Last edited by mbhandy; 8th March 06 at 10:15 PM.
    Very Sir Lord MrBill the Essential of Happy Bottomshire
    Listen to kpcw.org

    Every other Saturday 1-4 PM

  3. #33
    Join Date
    24th August 05
    Location
    TUSCON AZ south of PHENIX :)
    Posts
    672
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I have a pair of green boxers ....on the front Lt. side is the Guinness logo

    on the back across the bum it says "I (picture of a shamrock)(picture of a pint of Guinness)

    effectively saying "I shamrock guinness " :rolleyes:

    stupid I know but if I wear it I usually end up "mooning" the slogan across the back

    If I'm reg. then I tend to be a bit more ...whats the word.......shy?
    Irish diplomacy: is telling a man to go to he)) in such a way that he looks forward to the trip!

  4. #34
    Join Date
    5th September 05
    Location
    Chicago
    Posts
    5,144
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Yah...actually I saw a really cute pair of Snoopy St. Pat's Day boxers at the store the other day....

    ....well, if cute is your thing.....

    Best

    AA

  5. #35
    Join Date
    1st August 05
    Location
    Thornton, Colorado
    Posts
    882
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Moosehead
    I would be interested in knowing when, where and why the initial edict against the wearing of underwear came about?
    This is something I am very interested in knowing too. Does anybody out there know the facts?

    I tell my wife and others that tradition says nothing is to be worn under the kilt. But when they ask me why, I don’t know what to say. I can’t keep saying, “Just because!”.

  6. #36
    Join Date
    1st August 05
    Location
    Thornton, Colorado
    Posts
    882
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by auld argonian
    some yuppie mom whose little darling has just been "scarred for life and in need of many years of expensive therapy" because of a shift in the wind.
    And that’s just sad!

    What is it about a society that finds it disgusting to see what another human really looks like?

    We are all just wearing a disguise.

  7. #37
    macwilkin is offline
    Retired Forum Moderator
    Forum Historian

    Join Date
    22nd June 04
    Posts
    9,938
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    "regimental" history...

    Quote Originally Posted by mudd
    This is something I am very interested in knowing too. Does anybody out there know the facts?

    I tell my wife and others that tradition says nothing is to be worn under the kilt. But when they ask me why, I don’t know what to say. I can’t keep saying, “Just because!”.
    Well, technically, the practice could go back to the formation of the Highland regiments, the first being the Independent Highland Companies in 1724, which in turn became the Black Watch. If Highlanders did not wear undergarments in civilian life, then it's probably safe to say that they didn't when they took "the king's shilling" either. I'm sure Matt will have some information about that! :mrgreen:

    I do know of a number of popular French cartoons during the occupation after Napoleon's defeat that show various "flashing" incidents by Scottish soldiers. I also remember a story of a Higland soldier visiting a European monarch and having his kilt lifted by the king! I think that is in Baynes & Laffin's "Soldiers of Scotland"; I'll have a look when I get home this evening.

    Cheers,

    Todd

  8. #38
    Moosehead's Avatar
    Moosehead is offline Membership Revoked for repeated rule violations.
    Join Date
    7th January 06
    Location
    Prince Edward Island, Canada
    Posts
    566
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Todd,

    basically as I said. Still does not answer the question as to how it became so ingrained as "tradition".

    I also mentioned, though, that the Regs in both Canada and the UK have changed to reflect that going Regimental is not a must, nor is it desired under certain circumstances. That, then, would mean that the wearing of underwear is also now "traditional", seeing as the tradition came from the Regiments.

  9. #39
    macwilkin is offline
    Retired Forum Moderator
    Forum Historian

    Join Date
    22nd June 04
    Posts
    9,938
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by moosehead
    basically as I said. Still does not answer the question as to how it became so ingrained as "tradition".
    Well, if the custom did start with the formation of the Highland regiments, then yes, technically it does answer the question! :mrgreen:

    If we have documented evidence of Scottish soldiers not wearing undergarments from the late 1700's - early 1800's, then the "tradition" has been around for a while.

    "Highland Soldier" by Dianna Henderson may also be able to shed some light on this query.

    Cheers,

    Todd

  10. #40
    Join Date
    21st February 04
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    1,088
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Mr. Bill, I've seen that photo, and also read some discussion that it's probably Photoshopped. I don't know for certain, however.

    Wearing of undergarments while a Queen is on the throne sounds like something Queen Victoria would have come up with...
    An uair a théid an gobhainn air bhathal 'se is feàrr a bhi réidh ris.
    (When the smith gets wildly excited, 'tis best to agree with him.)

    Kiltio Ergo Sum.
    I Kilt, therefore I am. -McClef

Page 4 of 6 FirstFirst ... 23456 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

» Log in

User Name:

Password:

Not a member yet?
Register Now!
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.0