Perhaps Americans don't see the precision of language the same as we do this side of the pond.
A Kilt is seen as a male garment and skirt is seen as a female garment. The fact that they may share certain characteristics does not make them equal or interchangeable as similies.
And I fear that people flying to Edinburgh on the strength of that ad could be disappointed at the scarcity of men in the streets actually wearing their "skirts with pride."
As the ad was designed for and shown in America, it is the American sence of the word that counts. And for the most part, Americans will automatically call it a skirt. Not malicious, reactionary.
It is a good ad and I hope it sparks interest in travel to Edinburgh.
It would have been a far more serious offence to have written:
"Where a man can wear a KILT proudly"
since this would imply that, elsewhere, a kilt-wearer should be ashamed of himself.
Is there anyone out there that is ashamed of wearing an unbifurcated garment with such noble ancestry?
Bookmarks