Black Solid Kiltstore Kilt Revisited

[Mark Keeney]

OK I'll say it. It is too short. You should be wearing a longer kilt. You should wear it higher at the waist and just a tad bit lower at the knee. If you had a narrower waist the length wouldn't be a problem because the height / width visual ratio would be better.

It could be worn at that length but it doesn't flatter you at all. Don't wear it get a longer one and look sharp.

[Jerry]

OK I'll say it. It is too short. You should be wearing a longer kilt. You should wear it higher at the waist and just a tad bit lower at the knee. If you had a narrower waist the length wouldn't be a problem because the height / width visual ratio would be better.

It could be worn at that length but it doesn't flatter you at all. Don't wear it get a longer one and look sharp.

In other words, I'm fat. Just kidding, I know I'm overweight, and I'm working on that, but with the kilts I own, I can't afford to lose too much. I agree, I don't like wearing a kilt that low on my waist. If I had mearured correctly, the kilt would sit just above my belly button and hit around mid knee. That, or even a bit higher is where I wear most of my kilts. I think I'm going to let my daughter tryb this one on.

[scoutniagara]

A kilt for hiking/outdoors, should be shorter than a kilt for dressier occasions. It looks like it's off the back of the knee which would make it comfortable for hiking. Yes, it is at the short end of the kilt-length spectrum.

[smaughazard]

It looks like a perfect hill-walking/hot weather length to me; but keep in mind: YOU'RE the one who must find it appropriate!

Personally, I've always thought that just a bit short is better than a tad long.