X Marks the Scot - An on-line community of kilt wearers.

   X Marks Partners - (Go to the Partners Dedicated Forums )
USA Kilts website Celtic Croft website Celtic Corner website Houston Kiltmakers

User Tag List

Results 1 to 10 of 24

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    21st June 06
    Location
    San Francisco, California or there abouts
    Posts
    2,071
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by ardchoille View Post
    Well, that's true, that passage is there. However, I would think that anyone creating anything and planning to put a clan name on it would check with the authority of that clan, as the first step, in order to obtain permission. That's what I would do anyway. I just see it as a sign of respect. But, then again, "respect" is something many do not have in abundance.

    Note to cajunscot: Sorry about posting in the wrong section, I'll try to avoid that in the future.
    There might be a "chicken and egg" problem with your argument. You assume that the clan actually had a designated tartan before the weavers started naming various patterns "MacGregor." I know nothing of the MacGregors so that could be true, but for many clans the reality is just the opposite. There was no designated tartan, and the chiefs asked the weaving houses which tartan was theirs, as opposed to giving them "permission."

    This article by Matt explains it better than I can. "The sources of tartan."

    Best regards,

    Jake
    Last edited by Monkey@Arms; 27th August 07 at 06:01 PM. Reason: Linked to wrong article
    [B]Less talk, more monkey![/B]

  2. #2
    Join Date
    5th August 07
    Posts
    1,929
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Monkey@Arms View Post
    There might be a "chicken and egg" problem with your argument. You assume that the clan actually had a designated tartan before the weavers started naming various patterns "MacGregor." I know nothing of the MacGregors so that could be true, but for many clans the reality is just the opposite. There was no designated tartan, and the chiefs asked the weaving houses which tartan was theirs, as opposed to giving them "permission."

    This article by Matt explains it better than I can.
    "A tartan by any other name."

    Best regards,

    Jake
    That explains quite a bit. Thank you for that link
    It seems my way of thinking about this was in error.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    14th March 06
    Posts
    1,873
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    As I recall, one of the oldest tartans is one of the MacGregor's, the simple red and black Rob Roy tartan.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    18th December 06
    Location
    Burlington, Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    6,010
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Although I cannot follow the clan system I would like to observe that the weather tartan is made to look like it's been in a bog for a hundred years. It might be on the verge of a fashion tartan in that the hues might not be exact of the official tartan, but aren't the thread counts and colours the same? For what it's worth I like the weathered Bucannan tartan to the full on Modern Bucannan. Were I of this clan I would be more apt to wear the weathered and be most proud to do so.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    5th August 07
    Posts
    1,929
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by gilmore View Post
    As I recall, one of the oldest tartans is one of the MacGregor's, the simple red and black Rob Roy tartan.
    The tartan you are referring to is the MacGregor red and black (aka Rob Roy) tartan. Here's a bit of history about this tartan from Sir Malcolm MacGregor, Chief of Clan Gregor:

    The Red and Black MacGregor Tartan

    This tartan existed long before individual tartans became associated to particular clans Perhaps because it is one of the easiest setts to weave. There are those who question MacGregors' claim to this tartan as there are portraits of monarchs and other Highlanders wearing this sett. It is also claimed that it is not known what MacGregors would have worn during proscriptions and that they would not have worn their clan tartan so proudly. Two points here. First, I would argue strongly that due to proscription, the clan adopted it in 1603 because at that time it was not regarded as a MacGregor Tartan. It is my belief that by the end of the 18th century, nearly 200 years later, it came to be regarded as such. It is a fact that my family have worn this particular tartan since the late 18th century and regarded it as MacGregor tartan. My great. great. great, great grandfather would have worn it for good traditional reasons (see below), not on a whim. The tartan is included in the Highland Society of London's collection of 1816, which lends credence to this belief.

    Secondly, if the MacGregors themselves survived the proscriptions - is it so surprising that the tartan survived? Laws passed in Edinburgh and London were difficult to enforce in the Highlands and it is quite possible that in the Highlands people would have worn the tartan of their choice. The wearing of a particular tartan demonstrates a blood connection with a particular clan. Even my kinswoman, Miss Jean Rollo, who lived in Edinburgh in 1746, made it a point to wear a tartan gown in the Canongate in defiance of the law!

  6. #6
    macwilkin is offline
    Retired Forum Moderator
    Forum Historian

    Join Date
    22nd June 04
    Posts
    9,938
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Here are two articles from Matt's blog you might want to read concerning this subject, especially the second one:

    http://blog.albanach.org/2006/07/macneil-tartans.html

    http://blog.albanach.org/2006/05/macgregor-tartans.html

    I'm sure Matt can shed some light on the subject for you.

    Cheers,

    Todd

  7. #7
    Join Date
    5th August 07
    Posts
    1,929
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by cajunscot View Post
    Here are two articles from Matt's blog you might want to read concerning this subject, especially the second one:

    http://blog.albanach.org/2006/07/macneil-tartans.html

    http://blog.albanach.org/2006/05/macgregor-tartans.html

    I'm sure Matt can shed some light on the subject for you.

    Cheers,

    Todd
    Ah, yes, that second link is excellent! Thank you for posting it

  8. #8
    M. A. C. Newsome is offline
    INACTIVE

    Contributing Tartan Historian
    Join Date
    26th January 05
    Location
    Western NC
    Posts
    5,714
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Todd beat me to the punch with my blog posting commention on Sir Malcolm's letter.

    While it is very true that the only one who has authority to say what is and is not an actual clan tartan is the clan chief, we must remember that this authority is one of tradition. It is not a legal authority. There is really nothing that Sir Malcolm can do, in a court of law, to prevent people from non-approved tartans by the MacGregor name. All he can do is inform his clan that these and only these are recognized MacGregor tartans.

    One wearing his tartan for the purposes of clan identity will no doubt be very interested in finding out what their chief has to say on the matter and will want to follow his opinions. Other people will be less interested.

    One thing that was mentioned in Malcolm's letter were the number of "MacGregor" dance or dress tartans. These were not sanctioned as official MacGregor tartans. Now, there is a long tradition of Highland dancer's tartans being based on traditional clan tartans, but based in white (or cream) and rendered in much brighter colors (like teal, purple, gold, etc). Now, if you have a tartan that is based in the MacGregor pattern, just rendered in colors more appropriate to Highland Dancing, what else are you going to call it other than "MacGregor"?

    (As a side note, I beleive that Sir Malcolm later amended his statement to include the dance versions of the MacGregor tartan as official clan tartans, but only to be worn by MacGregor dancers).

    I have a friend who is a MacGregor (who also works at the museum), who simply doesn't like red tartans. He much prefers darker tartans, especially black. So he and I worked together to make a black tartan for him. Since he's a MacGregor, we based it in the MacGregor design, but reversed the red and black. We called the result the "Black MacGregor" tartan. He's standing to the right in the below photo:


    Now, this is not a clan tartan, nor does it pretend to be. We had it recorded with the Scottish Tartans Authority as a "personal" tartan. That's what it is. However, were we wrong in using the MacGregor name? The pattern of the tartan is the MacGregor pattern. As a personal tartan, we could name it after the person it was designed for... whose surname is MacGregor! There is no mistaking it. This is "a" MacGregor tartan, even though it is not a MacGregor clan tartan.

    It can be confusing, admittedly. Which is why research is always important.

    This is also one of the reasons why the forthcoming National Register of Tartans will be important. One of the things that this Register will supposedly do is earmark in some way which tartans are officially recognized by those with the authority to do so, and which ones are not. This will not keep personal tartans, or dancers tartans, or fashion tartans from being recorded, mind you. But it will separate them from tartans that have the official sanction of the clan chief (or another appropriate authority). The details of the National Register are still being worked out, but whatever the end result is, the hope of many is that this National Register will have the backing of the Scottish government behind it, so that if there are cases of copyright infringment or false claims being made, there will be a legal authority to rectify the situation.

    Aye,
    Matt

Similar Threads

  1. First complaint ever with Canadians
    By Graham in forum Miscellaneous Forum
    Replies: 32
    Last Post: 28th March 07, 06:52 PM
  2. Complaint
    By Martin S in forum Comments and Suggestions
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 23rd March 07, 07:12 AM
  3. USA TARTAN oooor heres my Idea for a McHenry Tartan
    By emeraldfalconoflight in forum General Kilt Talk
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 26th January 07, 06:29 AM
  4. A tartan similar to the Classic Barbour Tartan
    By wolfgang in forum Kilt Advice
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 27th February 05, 06:41 AM
  5. Complaint with USA Kilts
    By Graham in forum Contemporary Kilt Wear
    Replies: 27
    Last Post: 31st August 04, 12:36 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

» Log in

User Name:

Password:

Not a member yet?
Register Now!
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.0