X Marks the Scot - An on-line community of kilt wearers.
|
-
27th August 07, 05:59 PM
#8
 Originally Posted by Monkey@Arms
There might be a "chicken and egg" problem with your argument. You assume that the clan actually had a designated tartan before the weavers started naming various patterns "MacGregor." I know nothing of the MacGregors so that could be true, but for many clans the reality is just the opposite. There was no designated tartan, and the chiefs asked the weaving houses which tartan was theirs, as opposed to giving them "permission."
This article by Matt explains it better than I can.
"A tartan by any other name."
Best regards,
Jake
That explains quite a bit. Thank you for that link 
It seems my way of thinking about this was in error.
-
Similar Threads
-
By Graham in forum Miscellaneous Forum
Replies: 32
Last Post: 28th March 07, 06:52 PM
-
By Martin S in forum Comments and Suggestions
Replies: 8
Last Post: 23rd March 07, 07:12 AM
-
By emeraldfalconoflight in forum General Kilt Talk
Replies: 9
Last Post: 26th January 07, 06:29 AM
-
By wolfgang in forum Kilt Advice
Replies: 10
Last Post: 27th February 05, 06:41 AM
-
By Graham in forum Contemporary Kilt Wear
Replies: 27
Last Post: 31st August 04, 12:36 PM
Tags for this Thread
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks