If I hold up a green piece of paper and start to talk about it, and I say "This is not a green piece of paper!" that does not make it so. Clearly, it would still be a green piece of paper.

The post I read from Nick, seemed to be very biased. It seemed to be an attack post, regardless of the fact that it was stated that it was not.

We, in this forum, thankfully have people divided have two groups of opinions. That is a good and healthy situation. We learn from it, we grow from it.

Some define the kilt as being of wool, and only of wool! They think that a kilt made from any other fabric is not a kilt.

We have another group that define a kilt by How it is made, not what it is made from! I am in the second group.

I wear kilts everyday, as my normal manner of chosen attire. I own, wear and will purchase again kilts made from man-made fabrics. I own, wear and will purchase again kilts made from wool.

I have also been called cheap, frugal, and many other terms. I am! I try to get the most for my money. Buying and using kilts made from less expensive, man-made fabrics seems logical to me. I get more value for my money.

A well made kilt from man-made fabrics will, in some cases and situations be Better than the similar article in wool. Both fabrics have their use, their benefits, and their detriments.
I will continue to use both.

For someone to say that my kilts that are not wool are not even kilts puzzles me.