-
15th December 07, 07:07 AM
#41
I have used the response (In a Bar) of you show me yours and I'll show you mine and learned that there are a lot of women that will and I just give them the moon. :butt:
No frontal and it still keeps the mystery
Not....
MrBill
Very Sir Lord MrBill the Essential of Happy Bottomshire
Listen to kpcw.org
Every other Saturday 1-4 PM
-
-
17th December 07, 06:27 AM
#42
Originally Posted by mbhandy
I have used the response (In a Bar) of you show me yours and I'll show you mine and learned that there are a lot of women that will and I just give them the moon. :butt:
No frontal and it still keeps the mystery
Not....
MrBill
Me too - there are a lot of women who like to show off - but I don't moon them. I always wear a sporran, so I just grab my kilt at the side, and lift it enough to show plenty of leg.
But women in bars, are different than a women in a grocery store.
Then of course there is always my new answer - "Question 13!"
-
-
24th January 08, 07:41 AM
#43
As a regular busking piper, the reply to "that question" that I've found most effective is a big smile and the word "Lipstick".
-
-
24th January 08, 09:52 AM
#44
Don't answer them. Instead, ask the clot (or clotette) if they're wearing boxers with pictures of Homer Simpson on them, or maybe a thong-- "ooo, bet that's no fun on a bike"-- or maybe they're into tightie-whities? Tell me, what sort of underwear are you wearing? They will inevitably change the subject.
-
-
24th January 08, 10:30 AM
#45
It all depends on who is asking "the question" of me (& their tone). But if I do answer its usually a simple "whatever I bloody well want...or don't!"
[SIZE="2"][FONT="Georgia"][COLOR="DarkGreen"][B][I]T. E. ("TERRY") HOLMES[/I][/B][/COLOR][/FONT][/SIZE]
[SIZE="1"][FONT="Georgia"][COLOR="DarkGreen"][B][I]proud descendant of the McReynolds/MacRanalds of Ulster & Keppoch, Somerled & Robert the Bruce.[/SIZE]
[SIZE="1"]"Ah, here comes the Bold Highlander. No @rse in his breeks but too proud to tug his forelock..." Rob Roy (1995)[/I][/B][/COLOR][/FONT][/SIZE]
-
-
24th January 08, 01:54 PM
#46
The tradition NOT to wear underwear under the kilt, or to "go regimental" or "go commando", is sort of a misplaced idea. Before briefs, undershorts, or long-johns were invented, kilt wearers wore long shirts that were in essence slips. The shirt was considered an undergarment because a man always wore a waistcoat and/or a coat over that. The shirt or 'sark' was worn long, to mid-thigh or even lower, so this was the underwear. At night the kilt and waistcoat would be set aside and the man would sleep in his long shirt and night cap. Refer to any illustration of Ebenezer Scrooge getting a visit from Marley for a clue.
Because none of us wear the long-tailed shirts anymore, I see nothing new about wearing some other sort of undergarment with the kilt. It won't be a woman's slip, I'm tellin' ya.
-
-
24th January 08, 02:01 PM
#47
I absolutely agree with Jack, since I accept the theory that the plaid was worn over a leine, just like garments worn by other cultures in the ancient world.
-
-
25th January 08, 07:56 AM
#48
Originally Posted by Jack Daw
. . . The shirt or 'sark' was worn long, to mid-thigh or even lower, so this was the underwear. . . .
And this was the practice among most men in the western world, not just the kilted. With the possible exception of some very rich people, separate undergarments were introduced in the nineteenth century A.D. and became common only in the twentieth. I suspect that the main reason they became common at all was that the development of knitting machines made them economical.
It appears that the term "regimental" originated because some of H.M.'s regiments required the practice, at least among the O.R.'s, and the term "commando" (in this sense) was coined by people who were unaware of the regimental practice.
.
"No man is genuinely happy, married, who has to drink worse whiskey than he used to drink when he was single." ---- H. L. Mencken
-
-
25th January 08, 08:44 AM
#49
A way to preserve the mystery is, "As a gentleman, I would never answer that question."
Animo non astutia
-
-
25th January 08, 10:04 AM
#50
Originally Posted by Ian.MacAllan
And this was the practice among most men in the western world, not just the kilted. With the possible exception of some very rich people, separate undergarments were introduced in the nineteenth century A.D. and became common only in the twentieth. I suspect that the main reason they became common at all was that the development of knitting machines made them economical.
It appears that the term "regimental" originated because some of H.M.'s regiments required the practice, at least among the O.R.'s, and the term "commando" (in this sense) was coined by people who were unaware of the regimental practice.
.
YEP! The advent of the industrial revoluion in the 1840s resulted in the manufacture of a lot of new goods.
Last edited by Jack Daw; 25th January 08 at 12:19 PM.
-
Similar Threads
-
By James MacMillan in forum DIY Showroom
Replies: 17
Last Post: 20th August 07, 12:42 PM
-
By auld argonian in forum Kilts in the Media
Replies: 3
Last Post: 3rd November 06, 02:58 PM
-
By TechBear in forum How to Accessorize your Kilt
Replies: 16
Last Post: 18th May 06, 06:42 PM
-
By haukehaien in forum General Kilt Talk
Replies: 1
Last Post: 3rd March 06, 08:23 AM
-
By phil h in forum Kilt Nights
Replies: 14
Last Post: 2nd January 05, 06:32 PM
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks