X Marks the Scot - An on-line community of kilt wearers.

   X Marks Partners - (Go to the Partners Dedicated Forums )
USA Kilts website Celtic Croft website Celtic Corner website Houston Kiltmakers

User Tag List

Page 5 of 7 FirstFirst ... 34567 LastLast
Results 41 to 50 of 69
  1. #41
    Join Date
    30th November 05
    Location
    Mountains of Utah U.S.A.
    Posts
    2,903
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I have used the response (In a Bar) of you show me yours and I'll show you mine and learned that there are a lot of women that will and I just give them the moon. :butt:

    No frontal and it still keeps the mystery

    Not....

    MrBill
    Very Sir Lord MrBill the Essential of Happy Bottomshire
    Listen to kpcw.org

    Every other Saturday 1-4 PM

  2. #42
    James MacMillan is offline Membership Revoked for repeated rule violations.
    Join Date
    15th July 07
    Location
    California
    Posts
    4,573
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by mbhandy View Post
    I have used the response (In a Bar) of you show me yours and I'll show you mine and learned that there are a lot of women that will and I just give them the moon. :butt:

    No frontal and it still keeps the mystery

    Not....

    MrBill
    Me too - there are a lot of women who like to show off - but I don't moon them. I always wear a sporran, so I just grab my kilt at the side, and lift it enough to show plenty of leg.

    But women in bars, are different than a women in a grocery store.

    Then of course there is always my new answer - "Question 13!"

  3. #43
    Join Date
    24th January 08
    Location
    Oxford/London UK
    Posts
    123
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    As a regular busking piper, the reply to "that question" that I've found most effective is a big smile and the word "Lipstick".

  4. #44
    Join Date
    17th December 07
    Location
    Staunton, Va
    Posts
    4,948
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Don't answer them. Instead, ask the clot (or clotette) if they're wearing boxers with pictures of Homer Simpson on them, or maybe a thong-- "ooo, bet that's no fun on a bike"-- or maybe they're into tightie-whities? Tell me, what sort of underwear are you wearing? They will inevitably change the subject.

  5. #45
    Join Date
    23rd May 06
    Location
    Far NW Corner of Washington State, USA (48° 45' 51.5808" N / -122° 30' 36.6228" W)
    Posts
    5,715
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    It all depends on who is asking "the question" of me (& their tone). But if I do answer its usually a simple "whatever I bloody well want...or don't!"
    [SIZE="2"][FONT="Georgia"][COLOR="DarkGreen"][B][I]T. E. ("TERRY") HOLMES[/I][/B][/COLOR][/FONT][/SIZE]
    [SIZE="1"][FONT="Georgia"][COLOR="DarkGreen"][B][I]proud descendant of the McReynolds/MacRanalds of Ulster & Keppoch, Somerled & Robert the Bruce.[/SIZE]
    [SIZE="1"]"Ah, here comes the Bold Highlander. No @rse in his breeks but too proud to tug his forelock..." Rob Roy (1995)[/I][/B][/COLOR][/FONT][/SIZE]

  6. #46
    Join Date
    8th January 08
    Location
    The Bayou City - Houston, TX
    Posts
    6,730
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    The tradition NOT to wear underwear under the kilt, or to "go regimental" or "go commando", is sort of a misplaced idea. Before briefs, undershorts, or long-johns were invented, kilt wearers wore long shirts that were in essence slips. The shirt was considered an undergarment because a man always wore a waistcoat and/or a coat over that. The shirt or 'sark' was worn long, to mid-thigh or even lower, so this was the underwear. At night the kilt and waistcoat would be set aside and the man would sleep in his long shirt and night cap. Refer to any illustration of Ebenezer Scrooge getting a visit from Marley for a clue.

    Because none of us wear the long-tailed shirts anymore, I see nothing new about wearing some other sort of undergarment with the kilt. It won't be a woman's slip, I'm tellin' ya.

  7. #47
    Join Date
    3rd August 07
    Location
    New York City
    Posts
    2,693
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I absolutely agree with Jack, since I accept the theory that the plaid was worn over a leine, just like garments worn by other cultures in the ancient world.

  8. #48
    Join Date
    12th October 07
    Location
    Maryland
    Posts
    619
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Jack Daw View Post
    . . . The shirt or 'sark' was worn long, to mid-thigh or even lower, so this was the underwear. . . .
    And this was the practice among most men in the western world, not just the kilted. With the possible exception of some very rich people, separate undergarments were introduced in the nineteenth century A.D. and became common only in the twentieth. I suspect that the main reason they became common at all was that the development of knitting machines made them economical.

    It appears that the term "regimental" originated because some of H.M.'s regiments required the practice, at least among the O.R.'s, and the term "commando" (in this sense) was coined by people who were unaware of the regimental practice.


    .
    "No man is genuinely happy, married, who has to drink worse whiskey than he used to drink when he was single." ---- H. L. Mencken

  9. #49
    Join Date
    7th May 07
    Location
    Chicago, Illinois, USA
    Posts
    5,725
    Mentioned
    26 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    A way to preserve the mystery is, "As a gentleman, I would never answer that question."
    Animo non astutia

  10. #50
    Join Date
    8th January 08
    Location
    The Bayou City - Houston, TX
    Posts
    6,730
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Ian.MacAllan View Post
    And this was the practice among most men in the western world, not just the kilted. With the possible exception of some very rich people, separate undergarments were introduced in the nineteenth century A.D. and became common only in the twentieth. I suspect that the main reason they became common at all was that the development of knitting machines made them economical.

    It appears that the term "regimental" originated because some of H.M.'s regiments required the practice, at least among the O.R.'s, and the term "commando" (in this sense) was coined by people who were unaware of the regimental practice.
    .
    YEP! The advent of the industrial revoluion in the 1840s resulted in the manufacture of a lot of new goods.
    Last edited by Jack Daw; 25th January 08 at 12:19 PM.

Page 5 of 7 FirstFirst ... 34567 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. "Excess" material removal question
    By James MacMillan in forum DIY Showroom
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 20th August 07, 12:42 PM
  2. MacFeegles encounter "the Question"
    By auld argonian in forum Kilts in the Media
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 3rd November 06, 02:58 PM
  3. Question about hose and "sturdy" legs
    By TechBear in forum How to Accessorize your Kilt
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 18th May 06, 06:42 PM
  4. Be careful when answering "The Question" ...
    By haukehaien in forum General Kilt Talk
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 3rd March 06, 08:23 AM
  5. question about "bearfest" in Aug 2005
    By phil h in forum Kilt Nights
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 2nd January 05, 06:32 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

» Log in

User Name:

Password:

Not a member yet?
Register Now!
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.0