Originally Posted by
MacMillan of Rathdown
As I understand it, Lord Reay was asked to approve the tartan after it was designed and registered, and not before. It is incredibly "bad form" to do something without first securing permission, especially when the perpetrators profess both loyalty to their Chief and respect for the traditions of their clan.Precisely. Under Scots Law the name (in a limited sense) is the property of the Chief, who is legally styled: "Chief of the Name and the Arms of Clan X". The Scottish Tartan Authority checks with Clan Chiefs before registering a tartan with a clan name or connection.
So, when it was registered, did the chef get the request for approval from the STA?
Wallace Catanach, Kiltmaker
A day without killting is like a day without sunshine.
Bookmarks