X Marks the Scot - An on-line community of kilt wearers.
|
-
23rd February 08, 10:10 AM
#15
 Originally Posted by MacMillan of Rathdown
By which act the Sept would be leaving the clan and setting itself up as something else, lacking as they would a Chief. In short, they would no longer be considered part of the clan. In the old says I believe these were called "broken men", and were viewed almost as outcasts in traditional society.
Hello M.of R.,I am not wishing to be obtuse and I am not speaking with a huge amount of knowledge here but,there must be septs with their own family tartan,I expect I could think of some if I tried.
Lets say, the Chief of Clan MacKarrott has a sept called MacOnion and they,the MacOnions, decided to have a tartan made for the MacOnions, I don't think the Chief of Clan MacKarrott could stop(even if he wished to)that from happening.The MacOnions would still be a sept of the MacKarrotts though.Would they not?
-
Similar Threads
-
By McMillan in forum USA Kilts
Replies: 15
Last Post: 15th October 06, 11:29 AM
-
By Barb T in forum Professional Kiltmakers Hints and Tips
Replies: 7
Last Post: 20th May 06, 11:29 AM
-
By Kilted KT in forum Show us your pics
Replies: 12
Last Post: 7th April 06, 04:22 PM
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks