To be honest, I can't remember if that was with a $100 camera, or my '$600' camera (and that was what I payed for it used.) but I think it was the former, all I would have done is remove red eye and crop. Changing brightness and colors can do that to an image, as well as the light in which the image was shot, ie flash vs incandescent vs fluorescent vs sunlight....

But I will take your word for it that they match as you say with more than a fair amount of relief. I was worried there for a time.

Quote Originally Posted by BassClefB View Post
That I can't say... I looked back at the photos more closely after color-correcting, and what's getting lost is the deep blue between the brighter green sections of the tartan. Honestly, the photo of your son's kilt is true in color to the way mine is. I don't think there's a difference. The photo was brightened and color-corrected quite a bit, so some of that sharpness and detail is getting lost. Mind you, it's not a 'loud' kilt at all... not as bold overall as my Black Stewart or MacLaren. If you're at all in doubt, I'd ask Jerry to do a side-by-side comparison and see if there is a difference. If not, you'll know it's just my poor photography and lighting skills. haha!