Todd, I agree with you whole heartedly. As always, you bring thoughfulness and facts to the table.

What a refreshing insertion.
One
can have one's own arms in the US. You can even have one designed especially for you by the American College of Heraldry for a very resonable fee at
http://www.americancollegeofheraldry.org/. And that
is preferable to usurping another's. Maybe that would be frowned upon as worthless by some because it's not a government agency doing the grantling, but then again, it's a matter of taste when it comes to creating arms.
And the reason for one's own arms is to have a readily indentifiable "logo" of sorts for one's self or orgnaizatio. So why not have one's own arms created and used? If a corporation can have arms granted by the Lord Lyon, well, it's obviously only a matter of commerce there.
But then, I'm not sure that the Nolan arms shown are actually owned by an individual. For one thing, the name is Irish, so it's not subject to the Lord Lyon's purvue anyway. And few if any countries have the stringent laws regarding arms that Scotland has. Not even England is the same, as I understand it. (I am not passing myself off as anything other than a dilletante in this matter.

)
If BigMikeLV got it from a "bucket shop" and he likes it and it's not really hurting anyone, then go for it. Personally, I've given thought to assuming my own arms as well, but I haven't done anything about it. I'll be the first to concede that the only thing noble about any famly blood is the character, integrity, and honesty of the bearers of the various names in my own personal family tree.
But then, a man of noble character is a man indeed. And if the ABC Corporation can have arms, why not Joe Blow?
Thanks for pointing out that arms can be had, Todd. I had forgotten that fact.
Bookmarks