|
-
This is a quote from my clan's (Lockhart) webiste.
In December 1996, the Chief called a meeting at Biggar in Lanarkshire to explore the interest in establishing a Lockhart Family Society.
It was decided unanimously by those present that a society should be formed which would be open to anyone regardless of name, who consider themselves to be a member of the famly, or who has a strong interest in the family, its origins and its history.
According to my chief and the original organizers of the family society, blood ties were not required for membership, and a "strong interest in the family" is a good enough reason to a part of the family society. There's no mention of allegiance to the chief.
This is from the American branch's side:
Annual Membership - is limited to those at least eighteen (18) years of age, who are direct lineal descendants of a Scot bearing the surname LOCKHART; or who can trace their English ancestry to Clan Lockhart or one of its Spellings. Spouses of such persons shall be recognized as the same type membership with all benefits. Annual members pay dues, can vote, and may hold office.
My last name is not Lockhart, but my grandmother's maiden name was. And, just as on the clan webpage, there's no requirement of allegiance.
Is this pretty much standard practice for other clans/socities, or just for ours, which was trying to attract members?
Last edited by piperdbh; 13th May 09 at 11:20 AM.
Reason: added something useful
--dbh
When given a choice, most people will choose.
-
-
 Originally Posted by piperdbh
This is a quote from my clan's (Lockhart) webiste.
According to my chief and the original organizers of the family society, blood ties were not required for membership, and a "strong interest in the family" is a good enough reason to a part of the family society. There's no mention of allegiance to the chief.
This is from the American branch's side:
My last name is not Lockhart, but my grandmother's maiden name was. And, just as on the clan webpage, there's no requirement of allegiance.
Is this pretty much standard practice for other clans/socities, or just for ours, which was trying to attract members?
My take on it is that you don't need to be member of the Lockhart clan to be a member of the society, so allegiance doesn't enter into it. I believe that my clan's society in North America has even looser membership requirements. Still, you can be a member of the society but not a member of the clan.
"Touch not the cat bot a glove."
-
-
 Originally Posted by Macman
My take on it is that you don't need to be member of the Lockhart clan to be a member of the society, so allegiance doesn't enter into it. I believe that my clan's society in North America has even looser membership requirements. Still, you can be a member of the society but not a member of the clan.
True enough. However, if I remember correctly, membership in the American clan society gets you automatic membership in the clan. Whatever that amounts to.
--dbh
When given a choice, most people will choose.
-
Similar Threads
-
By David Thornton in forum General Kilt Talk
Replies: 13
Last Post: 13th March 06, 06:39 AM
-
By Iolaus in forum General Kilt Talk
Replies: 13
Last Post: 29th March 05, 06:45 AM
-
By Atticus in forum General Kilt Talk
Replies: 16
Last Post: 21st March 05, 11:14 AM
Tags for this Thread
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks