|
-
 Originally Posted by MacMillan of Rathdown
Rather than recite dozens of films I'll give you just one example: The Great Dictator, released in 1940. This was Charlie Chaplin's first all talking picture and, although nominally a comedy, in it Chaplin departed from his usual slapstick to include satire and social commentary. In the film he plays the dual roles of a Jewish barber in the ghetto, as well as Adenoid Hynkel, dictator of Tomania. Hitler's entire entourage is brilliantly satirized, as is his chief ally, Mussolini-- in this instance "Benzino Napaloni", the dictator of Bacteria, as played by Jack Oakie. The satire and social commentary was not lost on American audiences, and for the first time since the war had began, grass-roots Americans began to be openly hostile toward Hitler and his regime.
A brilliant film indeed but it hardly fits your defence of Hollywood at the time.
Chaplin remained a Brit throughout his entire Hollywood career and never became an American Citizen. He began preparation on the movie even before Britain went to war with Germany and he later stated that had he known the full horror of the Nazi regime he would never have made it. It was touch and go if it would ever be released and he had to largely finance it himself and in the teeth of alarm messages coming from United Artists.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Great_Dictator
So citing other examples of Hollywood's input in that period would still be welcome.
 Originally Posted by MacMillan of Rathdown
Just as soon as I finish the musical version of Oswald Mosley and Lord Ha-Ha In Love I'll get right on it.
Must be a long distance love story! 
 Originally Posted by MacMillan of Rathdown
It's called Dramatic License, and it goes back to the days of Shakespeare. You remember him. He was English, and he never took liberties with history. Did he? 
There is a world of difference between dramatic licence and wholesale rewriting of history which is less about taking liberties and more like taking the pi$$.
[B][COLOR="Red"][SIZE="1"]Reverend Earl Trefor the Sublunary of Kesslington under Ox, Venerable Lord Trefor the Unhyphenated of Much Bottom, Sir Trefor the Corpulent of Leighton in the Bucket, Viscount Mcclef the Portable of Kirkby Overblow.
Cymru, Yr Alban, Iwerddon, Cernyw, Ynys Manau a Lydaw am byth! Yng Nghiltiau Ynghyd!
(Wales, Scotland, Ireland, Cornwall, Isle of Man and Brittany forever - united in the Kilts!)[/SIZE][/COLOR][/B]
-
-
I'll mention another example of a movie made in 1941 to counter the isolationalist sentiment in the USA: Sgt. York, with Gary Cooper in the starring role.
The real Sgt. Alvin York was an outspoken interventionist, and had a number of public debates in the media with the noted isolationist Charles Lindbergh, who made a very vitrolic anti-Semitic, anti-British speech in Des Moines, Iowa as part of the "America First" committee:
http://www.charleslindbergh.com/amer...rst/speech.asp
Every time I read it, it makes me sick to my stomach.
T.
-
-
Of course Sergeant York was about the First World War rather than the second. No doubt it was trying to make a point though.
Spirit of St Louis hardly represents the real Lindy having read the speech.
The US only declared war upon Japan, not Germany. It was Germany that declared war upon the US even they were under no obligation under the Axis Pact to do so as the US had not attacked Japan.
Had Germany not declared war upon the US it might have taken the US a lot longer to take on Germany as well as Japan.
[B][COLOR="Red"][SIZE="1"]Reverend Earl Trefor the Sublunary of Kesslington under Ox, Venerable Lord Trefor the Unhyphenated of Much Bottom, Sir Trefor the Corpulent of Leighton in the Bucket, Viscount Mcclef the Portable of Kirkby Overblow.
Cymru, Yr Alban, Iwerddon, Cernyw, Ynys Manau a Lydaw am byth! Yng Nghiltiau Ynghyd!
(Wales, Scotland, Ireland, Cornwall, Isle of Man and Brittany forever - united in the Kilts!)[/SIZE][/COLOR][/B]
-
-
 Originally Posted by McClef
Of course Sergeant York was about the First World War rather than the second. No doubt it was trying to make a point though.
Exactly. If you've seen the movie, much of the story centers around York's pacifist beliefs as part of a Evangelical Christian Church. In the movie, York's Company Commander (he was drafted, regardless of his C.O. status) convinces York to fight using American history & the fight for freedom. It's actually fairly well done, but you can certainly see how the speech could be applied to the present (1941) circumstances.
Spirit of St Louis hardly represents the real Lindy having read the speech.
Lindbergh was a bit of an odd duck, to but it midly.
The US only declared war upon Japan, not Germany. It was Germany that declared war upon the US even they were under no obligation under the Axis Pact to do so as the US had not attacked Japan.
Had Germany not declared war upon the US it might have taken the US a lot longer to take on Germany as well as Japan.
Well, yes and no...Germany and the US were already unofficially at war, when the US Navy started providing escorts for British ships carrying lend-lease. Fine distinctions such as declarations of war meant nothing to the sailors who died on the USS Reuben James:
http://www.reuben-james.navy.mil/Sit...s/history.aspx
http://www.archives.gov/exhibits/a_p...ben_james.html
Regards,
Todd
-
-
 Originally Posted by McClef
The US only declared war upon Japan, not Germany. It was Germany that declared war upon the US even they were under no obligation under the Axis Pact to do so as the US had not attacked Japan.
Had Germany not declared war upon the US it might have taken the US a lot longer to take on Germany as well as Japan.
Japan also declared war on the U.S. before the U.S. declared war on Japan. Sorry, I've just heard too many people try to tell me that there was no formal declaration of war against Germany by the U.S. in WWII, but there was. It's mostly in the wording.
I tried to ask my inner curmudgeon before posting, but he sprayed me with the garden hose…
Yes, I have squirrels in my brain…
-
-
 Originally Posted by Ted Crocker
Japan also declared war on the U.S. before the U.S. declared war on Japan. Sorry, I've just heard too many people try to tell me that there was no formal declaration of war against Germany by the U.S. in WWII, but there was. It's mostly in the wording.
Ted,
But, the US declaration of war came in response to Germany's declaration, as per the BBC article I linked to. Trefor was correct in his original statement.
T.
-
-
 Originally Posted by cajunscot
Ted,
But, the US declaration of war came in response to Germany's declaration, as per the BBC article I linked to. Trefor was correct in his original statement.
T.
The same could be said about Japan, it's attack, and it's declaration of war.
Like I said, I only bring it up because there are a lot of people who have tried to argue that the U.S. never declared war against Germany, and that seemed to be what was being said. I don't think, after reading the post several times, that was what was meant.
* I had to edit an addition to this post.
* Sorry, it was an idiotic thing to even bring up, and I should have known better. *
Last edited by Bugbear; 28th May 09 at 12:37 PM.
I tried to ask my inner curmudgeon before posting, but he sprayed me with the garden hose…
Yes, I have squirrels in my brain…
-
-
Anyway, back to the original topic of this thread. 
One of the best WWII movies (and a British movie to boot) INMHO is Powell & Pressburger's The Life & Death of Colonel Blimp.
T.
-
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks