-
8th November 09, 01:24 PM
#1
Correct Term
I snapped this photo in the Great Hall of Stirling Castle. Just wondering what the correct term would be to describe it. Scottish: Crest? Seal? Coat of Arms? Thanks.
-
-
8th November 09, 02:11 PM
#2
It's a Tapestry
-
-
8th November 09, 02:23 PM
#3
I believe that is an example of the arms of the queen, or anyone who is the monarch of Scotland.
Jim Killman
Writer, Philosopher, Teacher of English and Math, Soldier of Fortune, Bon Vivant, Heart Transplant Recipient, Knight of St. Andrew (among other knighthoods)
Freedom is not free, but the US Marine Corps will pay most of your share.
-
-
8th November 09, 03:01 PM
#4
It's a form of the Scottish Royal Coat of Arms.
Technically it is no longer in effect as Scotland is no longer a Kingdom in itself and has not been since 1603.
It is in truth not for glory, nor riches, nor honours that we are fighting, but for freedom -- for that alone, which no honest man gives up but with life itself.
-
-
8th November 09, 03:05 PM
#5
I would call it a Coat of Arms.
-
-
8th November 09, 04:49 PM
#6
It is the full achievement (shield, helmet, crest, supporters, and motto) of the arms of the Scottish sovereign. In this instance the arms (the shield) is encircled with the collar of the Order of the Thistle.
Last edited by MacMillan of Rathdown; 8th November 09 at 05:36 PM.
-
-
8th November 09, 05:22 PM
#7
Originally Posted by Paul.
It's a form of the Scottish Royal Coat of Arms.
Technically it is no longer in effect as Scotland is no longer a Kingdom in itself and has not been since 1603.
Technically it IS in effect. Those are the ensigns armorial of the King of Scots. The current bearer of these ensigns armorial is HM The Queen.
You doubt the legitimacy of these arms? Is the Lion Rampant banner used officially in Scotland? Of course it is. It is the banner form of the shield of this coat of arms.
-
-
8th November 09, 05:54 PM
#8
Originally Posted by Paul.
It's a form of the Scottish Royal Coat of Arms.
Technically it is no longer in effect as Scotland is no longer a Kingdom in itself and has not been since 1603.
Scotland was (until the Union of Parliaments in 1707) a totally independent kingdom. In more modern times the dual monarchy of Austria-Hungary (two kingdoms with a common monarch) would be comparable to the status of Scotland within the United Kingdom prior to the union of parliaments.
At the end of WWI the Austrian government moved to abolish the monarchy, but no such action took place in Hungary with the result that Dr. Otto Habsburg is still the de jure king of Hungary.
-
-
8th November 09, 06:01 PM
#9
Originally Posted by MacMillan of Rathdown
Scotland was (until the Union of Parliaments in 1707) a totally independent kingdom. In more modern times the dual monarchy of Austria-Hungary (two kingdoms with a common monarch) would be comparable to the status of Scotland within the United Kingdom prior to the union of parliaments.
At the end of WWI the Austrian government moved to abolish the monarchy, but no such action took place in Hungary with the result that Dr. Otto Habsburg is still the de jure king of Hungary.
And it was a Scot, Colonel EL Strutt of the Royal Scots, who kept his father, Blessed Karl of Austria, from giving up the throne of Hungary.
T.
-
Similar Threads
-
By fortcollinsjerry in forum Miscellaneous Forum
Replies: 20
Last Post: 21st December 09, 05:08 AM
-
By MacMillan of Rathdown in forum Traditional Kilt Wear
Replies: 68
Last Post: 26th July 09, 01:14 PM
-
By JimB in forum Professional Kiltmakers Hints and Tips
Replies: 8
Last Post: 28th August 06, 01:24 PM
-
By Robert Lamb in forum General Kilt Talk
Replies: 8
Last Post: 8th November 04, 12:46 PM
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks