X Marks the Scot - An on-line community of kilt wearers.

   X Marks Partners - (Go to the Partners Dedicated Forums )
USA Kilts website Celtic Croft website Celtic Corner website Houston Kiltmakers

User Tag List

Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst ... 234
Results 31 to 36 of 36
  1. #31
    Join Date
    2nd July 06
    Location
    Madison, Wisconsin
    Posts
    4,678
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by ###KILTEDKIWI### View Post
    As far as I am aware, Fitz was also adopted by the English to describe a denotation for the bastard (illegitimate) son of someone in high station...

    i.e. Kings, Princes...

    oh hang on, better back that up...



    Ah, thats cleared that up then.
    Though it has been used in that context, the "bastard" connotation is not the original meaning of "Fitz". The prefix "Fitz" is Anglo-Norman and originally means "Son of". Its spread throughout Ireland occurred during the Norman invasion of the 12th century.

  2. #32
    Join Date
    15th July 08
    Location
    New Zealand
    Posts
    631
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Though it has been used in that context, the "bastard" connotation is not the original meaning of "Fitz". The prefix "Fitz" is Anglo-Norman and originally means "Son of". Its spread throughout Ireland occurred during the Norman invasion of the 12th century.
    Yip, wasnt disputing that.

  3. #33
    Join Date
    17th December 07
    Location
    Staunton, Va
    Posts
    4,948
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by beloitpiper View Post
    Though it has been used in that context, the "bastard" connotation is not the original meaning of "Fitz". The prefix "Fitz" is Anglo-Norman and originally means "Son of". Its spread throughout Ireland occurred during the Norman invasion of the 12th century.
    There wasn't a Norman invasion. They came at the request of Dermot McMurrough Kavanagh, the King of Leinster, who hired them to aid in his war to secure the High Kingship of Ireland. As part of the deal, McMurrough Kavanagh gave Richard de Clair (Strongbow), the leader of the Anglo-Normans, the hand of his daughter in marriage, and settled extensive lands on Strongbow and his knights. Within a generation these Hibernio-Normans were "more Irish than the Irish", speaking Gaelic and marrying in to all of the ancient Irish noble houses. They came as allies of a Irish king, adopted Irish ways, and in a generation became Irish.

  4. #34
    Join Date
    2nd July 06
    Location
    Madison, Wisconsin
    Posts
    4,678
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by MacMillan of Rathdown View Post
    There wasn't a Norman invasion. They came at the request of Dermot McMurrough Kavanagh, the King of Leinster, who hired them to aid in his war to secure the High Kingship of Ireland. As part of the deal, McMurrough Kavanagh gave Richard de Clair (Strongbow), the leader of the Anglo-Normans, the hand of his daughter in marriage, and settled extensive lands on Strongbow and his knights. Within a generation these Hibernio-Normans were "more Irish than the Irish", speaking Gaelic and marrying in to all of the ancient Irish noble houses. They came as allies of a Irish king, adopted Irish ways, and in a generation became Irish.
    Right. But Kavanagh only invited them over to get back at Rory O'Connor who had defeated him after Muirchertach MacLochlainn died in 1166. Kavanagh lost his kingdom and to get it back he sacrificed most of Ireland to appease Henry II and the Pope. So yes, eventually they became the oft-quoted "More Irish than the Irish themselves," but it started out as a land-grab.

  5. #35
    Join Date
    22nd November 07
    Location
    US
    Posts
    11,355
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Oh no... Do I need to start looking through books on Irish history now?
    I tried to ask my inner curmudgeon before posting, but he sprayed me with the garden hose…
    Yes, I have squirrels in my brain…

  6. #36
    Join Date
    13th May 08
    Location
    Huzhou, Zhejiang, China
    Posts
    529
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Tobus View Post
    But my real question is why Kilpatrick is considered a sept of Colquhoun instead of something else. Since the name Colquhoun was first used by a Kilpatrick (and according to most purists, you can't just randomly change your name to identify with the clan you like; it must be given to you by your father), why would the clan not be called Clan Kilpatrick?
    As a general rule, Scottish clans take their name from the surname of the chief. If the chief's surname is Colquhoun, the clan is Clan Colquhoun.

    And fixed, inherited surnames may be the tradition, but they're a relatively recent tradition, compared to the clans themselves. In Scotland I believe they only adopted fixed surnames around the 1500s. In Iceland and Mongolia they still haven't adopted fixed surnames. Instead, they use real patronymics. In China and Rome, on the other hand, they had fixed family names well before the rest of the world.

Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst ... 234

Similar Threads

  1. UK Versus FK
    By NancyMan in forum Contemporary Kilt Wear
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 27th June 06, 01:04 PM
  2. Clan/Sept relationships
    By Streetcar in forum General Kilt Talk
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 17th December 05, 02:29 PM
  3. 4 yd. 16 oz. versus 8 yd. 11 oz.
    By cavscout in forum Kilt Advice
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 1st October 05, 02:55 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

» Log in

User Name:

Password:

Not a member yet?
Register Now!
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.0