|
-
29th December 09, 08:46 PM
#1
 Originally Posted by Leprechaun-91
Philippine Islands are generally listed as "Pacific Islanders" are they not? (At least I see that box here in he States.)
No they are not. In the UK, there is no sub-group called Pacific Islands mentioned in official forms. If there were, it would not apply anyway, as the Philippines (comprising inhabited/uninhabited islands including large land-masses, totaling 7,107 nos) is not included in Pacific Islands. It is properly counted as part of South East Asia.
As I said, the only available box was “Others”, as the forms didn’t even have “South East Asia”.
That brings me to my own experience whilst seeking a temporary flat in 1984. A friend I was living with temporarily in Hoxton suggested I contact Hackney Borough Council (a rather loony-left-wing London borough council based in Mare Street which supported Colonel Gaddafi and such-like) to house me with council-owned rented accommodation until I could buy somewhere. I had to fill in a form which would be appraised by HBC and points awarded for deservedness. When I came to the ethnic background section, I noticed lots of tick-boxes. There was a whole mass of boxes covering the Indian sub-continent, including Gujerati, Punjabi, Kashmiri, Chettinad, Karnatika/Tamil to name a few; likewise many boxes covering African backgrounds plus various Caribbean and North/South American etc, there were some Arab/Middle East boxes too. They also had boxes for gay and lesbian etc. Then there were 3 more boxes – white, Irish and Others. So all the Eastern part of Asia had to put “Others” (including the various diversified Chinese regions, Indonesia, Philippines, Japan, Korea, Thailand, etc etc), while Caucasians of various nationalities and ethnic backgrounds had to put "White" of all things (not even the modern Caucasian version !). So, Scotland, England, Wales, France, Germany, Spain, Italy, USA, Canada, Russia, Sweden, Poland, Lithuania, Aus, NZ etc were all lumped together.
The one which got my goat in a big way was “Irish”. Hackney Borough Council passively (sometimes actively) supported the IRA at that time and I have been in a pub in that borough when they passed round a black beret for a collection. I certainly did not give and no doubt people in the pub saw that. Hackney thought Irish people merited special treatment, that their culture was so foreign it needed special care. My reaction to the form was, the Irish are no more and no less different than the Scots. So I ignored “White” and filled in the “Others” box and wrote below it “Scottish”.
Suffice to say, I didn’t get the flat as I didn’t qualify, I was too bourgeois for them.
-
Similar Threads
-
By Highland Logan in forum Nova Scotia
Replies: 2
Last Post: 25th September 09, 05:27 AM
-
By Cerebite in forum Utah
Replies: 1
Last Post: 26th April 09, 06:04 PM
-
By Kent Frazier in forum Highland Games and Celtic Event Discussion
Replies: 3
Last Post: 14th May 08, 06:55 PM
-
By Arlen in forum Kilt Nights
Replies: 26
Last Post: 18th May 07, 04:03 AM
-
By kilt by death in forum Kilt Board Newbie
Replies: 14
Last Post: 4th April 05, 07:08 AM
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks