|
-
8th August 10, 04:23 AM
#1
One of the major advantages of a traditional four yard box pleated kilt, to me, is that it is a lighter weight, more balanced kilt. All that adds up to more comfort.
I've never worn one of Lady Chrystel's "double box pleated" kilts, but it seems to me that it would be just as heavy as a standard 8 yard knife pleated kilt, with most of the weight concentrated in the back, like any 8 yard kilt.
So if you want a kilt that looks like an historic four yard kilt, but feels like a modern eight yard kilt, that's what the double box pleated kilt was invented for.
-
-
8th August 10, 06:30 AM
#2
Compromise?
 Originally Posted by M. A. C. Newsome
One of the major advantages of a traditional four yard box pleated kilt, to me, is that it is a lighter weight, more balanced kilt. All that adds up to more comfort.
I've never worn one of Lady Chrystel's "double box pleated" kilts, but it seems to me that it would be just as heavy as a standard 8 yard knife pleated kilt, with most of the weight concentrated in the back, like any 8 yard kilt.
So if you want a kilt that looks like an historic four yard kilt, but feels like a modern eight yard kilt, that's what the double box pleated kilt was invented for.
I have a related question for Matt, if I may Jordan?
Matt,
Although I understand the historic, as well as the balance, issues, I am not a big fan of the barrel stave look of a 4 yard box pleated kilt. I know that some people really like a 6 yard knife pleated to achieve the balance and the movement. My question is, have you ever done a 6 yard box with narrower pleats? Or would that be an unwise compromise?
And, would that construction increase the movement ("swish") of the pleats ?
Thanks,
Brooke
-
-
9th August 10, 03:29 AM
#3
 Originally Posted by MacMillan's son
I have a related question for Matt, if I may Jordan?
Matt,
Although I understand the historic, as well as the balance, issues, I am not a big fan of the barrel stave look of a 4 yard box pleated kilt. I know that some people really like a 6 yard knife pleated to achieve the balance and the movement. My question is, have you ever done a 6 yard box with narrower pleats? Or would that be an unwise compromise?
And, would that construction increase the movement ("swish") of the pleats ?
Thanks,
Brooke
No, I never have, but there is no reason why I couldn't. Yes, it would increase the "swish" a bit, because adding extra weight to the back of the kilt would tend to give it more movement.
-
-
9th August 10, 07:11 PM
#4
 Originally Posted by M. A. C. Newsome
One of the major advantages of a traditional four yard box pleated kilt, to me, is that it is a lighter weight, more balanced kilt. All that adds up to more comfort.
I've never worn one of Lady Chrystel's "double box pleated" kilts, but it seems to me that it would be just as heavy as a standard 8 yard knife pleated kilt, with most of the weight concentrated in the back, like any 8 yard kilt.
So if you want a kilt that looks like an historic four yard kilt, but feels like a modern eight yard kilt, that's what the double box pleated kilt was invented for.
Well, I am a person of considerable size, and my double box pleat only took 3 meters of double width. And per her website, this is the standard. I don't own a wool 8 yard tank, so I can't compare, but the swish appears about the same, but it's about 2 yards less fabric.
Geoff Withnell
Geoff Withnell
"My comrades, they did never yield, for courage knows no bounds."
No longer subject to reveille US Marine.
-
Similar Threads
-
By Nighthawk in forum General Kilt Talk
Replies: 22
Last Post: 5th April 10, 06:50 PM
-
By Rollo in forum General Kilt Talk
Replies: 5
Last Post: 30th July 09, 07:55 PM
-
By meinfs in forum DIY Showroom
Replies: 38
Last Post: 8th January 09, 10:04 PM
-
By M. A. C. Newsome in forum Member Written Articles
Replies: 0
Last Post: 13th July 07, 05:10 AM
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks