X Marks the Scot - An on-line community of kilt wearers.
|
-
24th March 11, 05:20 PM
#1
 Originally Posted by WVHighlander
That would be interesting...for sure. I would look into that. The main reason for Scotland is heritage.
It funny with G. Washington, J. Adams (both), and T. Jefferson so interested in heraldry that we didn't come up with our own office. I do understand the reason at the time being disdain for ANYTHING old world, elite, or noble. Even the Society of Cincinnati got remarks about it when it was created.
The AHS had a nice collection of articles on the arms of American Presidents:
http://www.americanheraldry.org/page...n=Main.Notable
Washington was the most enthusiastic about heraldry, and said that there was nothing incompatiable with the Republic in a letter to a fellow who wanted to form an American "college of arms" after the Revolution. I don't think the Adamses or TJ shared Washington's enthusiasm, although as you state, they did have their own arms.
My favorite president, Theodore Roosevelt, was also "dee-lighted" in bearing arms, and reportedly had a tattoo of them somewhere on his body. 
T.
-
Similar Threads
-
By Tiny in forum The Tartan Place
Replies: 15
Last Post: 18th July 10, 03:56 AM
-
By Iainkp in forum Kilt Board Newbie
Replies: 26
Last Post: 29th April 10, 10:25 AM
-
By Mike1 in forum How Do I...
Replies: 2
Last Post: 25th September 08, 07:36 AM
-
By tartanherring in forum Kilt Board Newbie
Replies: 44
Last Post: 31st August 08, 09:08 PM
-
By RockyR in forum USA Kilts
Replies: 58
Last Post: 17th July 07, 07:12 AM
Tags for this Thread
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks