-
14th January 10, 06:07 AM
#1
 Originally Posted by thescot
This is not a bad look, but the military in me would like to fix his gig line.  ith:
That was my first thought as well.
 Originally Posted by MacMillan of Rathdown
Life is full of bad "solutions" to what should be non-existant problems. If one followed Thompson's suggestion to its (il)logical conclusion, one would suppose he'd advise Texas businessmen to tuck their waistcoats into their suit trousers so people could see their rodeo belt buckles. Sorry, but as this is the "Traditional" forum, I'm sticking to my guns with a very traditional comment:
Kilted, or in trousers, one should never "tuck in" his waistcoat.
I agree. I can't imagine tucking the waistcoat into my kilt, or the vest into my trousers (back when I was required to wear three piece suits.)
[I][B]Nearly all men can stand adversity. If you really want to test a man’s character,
Give him power.[/B][/I] - [I]Abraham Lincoln[/I]
-
-
8th February 10, 04:34 PM
#2
 Originally Posted by thescot
This is not a bad look, but the military in me would like to fix his gig line.  ith:
Lovely wildcat sporran the chap is wearing on our left. I woul donly wear a belt with a waistcoat for eveningwear and in the manner to wear the belt is hidden by the waiscoat and doublet-this of course is only if you will be wearing a dirk with the regulation doublet or the sheriffmuir-both of which have waistcoats.
-
-
12th January 10, 07:16 PM
#3
 Originally Posted by The Deil's Chiel
Young Struan, chief of Clan Donnachaid, could use a few pointers from some of the old timers...that loose droopy belt he's wearing in this photo makes him look like an American tourist.

Could he be wearing a truss?
Last edited by MacMillan of Rathdown; 25th January 10 at 09:40 PM.
-
-
13th January 10, 08:01 PM
#4
 Originally Posted by The Deil's Chiel
Young Struan, chief of Clan Donnachaid, could use a few pointers from some of the old timers...that loose droopy belt he's wearing in this photo makes him look like an American tourist.

I'm positive that he was wearing a belt with his waistcoat at The Gathering. My girlfriend had a short conversation with him as he is technically her clan chief (not that she'd bothered by that!). He looked like he was dressed very well, too.
It is in truth not for glory, nor riches, nor honours that we are fighting, but for freedom -- for that alone, which no honest man gives up but with life itself.
-
-
12th January 10, 07:09 PM
#5
 Originally Posted by The Deil's Chiel
Imagine, for a second, a belt almost an inch wider, with one of those chrome-plated index card belt buckles that most people own/wear... somehow I think that would look a whole lot worse...
-
-
12th January 10, 07:18 PM
#6
That old chief is just crusty looking enough to pull it off.
I have seen the look on Thompson's book but I think the look would create a fine line between disaster and success.
-
-
13th January 10, 05:44 AM
#7
This is not a bad look, but the military in me would like to fix his gig line.
I'd also like to fix his garter flashes. Good grief.
-
-
13th January 10, 06:17 AM
#8
His flashes aren't too far off. Especially his left, the regiments line the front flash up to the line of the shin. Maybe he is an old military man.
 Originally Posted by Tobus
I'd also like to fix his garter flashes. Good grief.
-
-
13th January 10, 06:18 AM
#9
 Originally Posted by Asser 1
His flashes aren't too far off. Especially his left, the regiments line the front flash up to the line of the shin. Maybe he is an old military man.
I could appreciate that if the flashes were in roughly the same place on each leg.
-
-
13th January 10, 06:44 AM
#10
Yes wearing a waistbelt over the waistcoat appears in many old images of people in Highland Dress. But to call it the only "proper" or "correct" way goes beyond the evidence I see.
As always, for a "reality check" I go back to The Highlanders of Scotland, for indeed that source is unique.
Of the figures which are wearing jackets and waistcoats, and the jacket is unbuttoned, I see:
16 men wearing no visible waistbelts
8 men wearing their waistbelt over both their jacket and waistcoat
2 men wearing waistbelts over the waistcoat
1 man wearing a waistbelt over his waistcoat but is jacketless
NONE of the waistcoats are tucked into the kilt, including the two men wearing waistbelts over their waistcoats. Here's one of them:

Also, NONE of the men are wearing waistbelts peaking out from under their waistcoats. This has always looked sloppy and "wrong" to me. It just wasn't done in the past... at least I don't recall coming across a vintage image of it.
Here's what it looks like:

Note how the black belt ruins the look of the shape of the bottom of the black waistcoat, foils the waistcoat's "line" and cut.
In a band, where you're stuggling to present uniformity, the waistbelts always fight against it, as they droop down to various level and are seen to various different degrees. How much better it looks, how much more uniform, and also how much more in line with tradtion it is to go without the belts:
Last edited by OC Richard; 13th January 10 at 06:53 AM.
-
Similar Threads
-
By svc40bt in forum Kilt Advice
Replies: 41
Last Post: 21st January 09, 11:48 AM
-
By runewolf in forum How to Accessorize your Kilt
Replies: 6
Last Post: 5th January 09, 04:38 PM
-
By JockEleven in forum Kilt Advice
Replies: 8
Last Post: 14th September 04, 01:37 AM
-
By kilted in KC in forum How to Accessorize your Kilt
Replies: 6
Last Post: 17th June 04, 09:32 PM
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks