-
25th April 11, 01:15 AM
#1
I feel that one's predisposition towards a monarchy depends very much on one's background. Many of the Americans in the discussion had ties to or prior experience with a monarchy. The narrator/report has Scottish and Canadian parents, which makes him no stranger to the Crown.
However, many Americans have zero experience with living under a monarch, and based on the manner and reasons under which the US was founded there's an inherent distrust. Despite the fact that the Queen seems like a perfectly wonderful lady and a credit to her country, I think most Americans couldn't fathom the idea of the US under a king or queen. It's ... un-American.
-
-
25th April 11, 03:56 AM
#2
Last edited by macwilkin; 25th April 11 at 07:47 PM.
-
-
25th April 11, 05:18 AM
#3
There is a lot to be said for having a nonpartisan head of state, and there are even advantages to having such a person appointed for life. The Royal Family is effectively an institution for training people for that role. But behind the notion of a monarchy is the idea that there are people whom a higher power has appointed to rule by reason of birth, and I would hate to see the USA go that way- not that there's much danger. I support the Monarchy because it's a huge part of my history and heritage, and also because I'm that sort of person, but the USA has done OK by going its own way.
-
-
25th April 11, 05:40 AM
#4
Given the discussion, I'll share a memory where I had the chance to touch that point within my own heritage.
I worked in customer service for a local company for many years. One customer who came to me turned out to be the first cousin of the King of Spain, and was the son of the King's older uncle. Had Franco not intervened and named Juan Carlos as King, this young man would have held that position.
The fact that my great-grandparents were born as subjects to his grandfather had a strong resonance and point of connection between us for me, given my strong sense of history as...well, our story.
-
-
25th April 11, 05:57 AM
#5
Last edited by macwilkin; 25th April 11 at 05:14 PM.
-
-
26th April 11, 07:14 PM
#6
You get a gold star for spotting the deliberate mistake.
-
-
27th April 11, 12:37 AM
#7
Perhaps you had Priscilla, Queen of the Desert in mind MOR.
[B][COLOR="Red"][SIZE="1"]Reverend Earl Trefor the Sublunary of Kesslington under Ox, Venerable Lord Trefor the Unhyphenated of Much Bottom, Sir Trefor the Corpulent of Leighton in the Bucket, Viscount Mcclef the Portable of Kirkby Overblow.
Cymru, Yr Alban, Iwerddon, Cernyw, Ynys Manau a Lydaw am byth! Yng Nghiltiau Ynghyd!
(Wales, Scotland, Ireland, Cornwall, Isle of Man and Brittany forever - united in the Kilts!)[/SIZE][/COLOR][/B]
-
-
27th April 11, 07:01 AM
#8
White, Black, and Rainbow (?) cockades... who will be the next Queen?
Lines seem to be being drawn between the camps: The Shroakians on one side, the Elvisians on the other, and somewhere, streaking across the Australian outback, the Priscillians are gathering a momentum of their own... (Good one Trefor!)
-
-
27th April 11, 07:09 AM
#9
 Originally Posted by MacMillan of Rathdown
Lines seem to be being drawn between the camps: The Shroakians on one side, the Elvisians on the other, and somewhere, streaking across the Australian outback, the Priscillians are gathering a momentum of their own...  (Good one Trefor!)
This has all the makings of a Star Wars v. Trekkie brawl.
-
-
27th April 11, 10:56 AM
#10
I wouldn't count the Nortonians out just yet. You never know.
-
Similar Threads
-
By GreatWhiteDan in forum DIY Kilt and Accessories Help
Replies: 14
Last Post: 19th May 10, 07:12 AM
-
By Lachlan09 in forum Miscellaneous Forum
Replies: 37
Last Post: 15th March 10, 10:39 AM
-
By NewEnglander in forum The Pub
Replies: 29
Last Post: 8th March 10, 02:44 PM
-
By KiltedMariner in forum General Kilt Talk
Replies: 59
Last Post: 11th March 09, 11:42 AM
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks