X Marks the Scot - An on-line community of kilt wearers.

   X Marks Partners - (Go to the Partners Dedicated Forums )
USA Kilts website Celtic Croft website Celtic Corner website Houston Kiltmakers

User Tag List

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 30 of 30

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    27th December 07
    Location
    Kentucky,USA
    Posts
    399
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Im 5-11,170,and 34 to 36 waist.and I usally take two inches off Jerrys kilts.
    I like the kilt to hit the top of the knee cap,and wear them just at my navel.
    May not be the correct way to wear them,but who cares,its how it feels that I care about.
    They just dont look right above my navel.
    Throw me in for 22 maybe even 22.5 inch kilts from Jerry would be great.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    15th May 08
    Location
    Near Frederick, Maryland
    Posts
    636
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I am 5' 11". My USA Kilts Semi-Traditional at 22" length, selvage just above the knee cap, sits 1-2" above my navel; long torso, short legs. Put me down for 22" Stillwaters as well.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    22nd July 08
    Location
    Victoria, BC
    Posts
    2,878
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    It's easy for someone in my shoes (183cm, 85kg -- sorry, my American brothers -- I've been living in metricland so long now that I've forgotten what that is in Imperial. I know 183 is 6'0" but I have no idea about 85kg in pounds) to comment on this issue... But as far as kilt length goes, it's always easier to shorten something if you need to. Lengthening is rather impossible. Rather than waiting until a purveyor of kilts starts selling shorter ones, it's probably much easier to befriend a good seamstress or tailor.

    FWIW, all my "standard" off-the-rack kilts -- SWK, KM, and Hassan Geoffrey, are identical in length and are very similar in how they sit around my waist. I do find that the most comfortable position for them is just below the navel, and if I wear it at that position and kneel (as if in prayer), the bottom edge of the kilt comes within about 1 cm of the floor, but doesn't quite touch it. This, according to everything I've read, is the correct length.

    Now, if you go shopping on the Utilikilts website, they do have their "contour cut" (used to be called the beergut cut) for the more "fluffy" gentleman (fluffy -- as in Garbriel Iglesias). Examining some of those may help in your physiometric analysis.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    12th October 07
    Location
    Maryland
    Posts
    619
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Useful conversion factors:
    1 Kg = 2.2 lbs
    1 inch = 2.5 cm

    183 cm = 6' 1.2"
    85 Kg = 187 lbs

    .
    "No man is genuinely happy, married, who has to drink worse whiskey than he used to drink when he was single." ---- H. L. Mencken

  5. #5
    Join Date
    26th November 04
    Location
    Dayton, Ohio
    Posts
    883
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I like the length to be at the top of the knee cap so 23" works for me on a traditional kilt. Two of my contemporary kilts I wear at the hip where I would my jeans. One is 21" or maybe it was 20", don't remember. It comes to the top of the knee. The second turned out to be closer to 19" so it is little short but for summer hiking it works.

    Mike

  6. #6
    Join Date
    17th July 08
    Location
    Fayetteville, NC
    Posts
    1,879
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Just a couple of comments: On a man, the waist is almost always at the naval. On a woman it is somewhat lower. This is pretty much a constant, with only very slight variations. (Don't ask my why, ask the designer!

    In the Navy we used to have a joke about a pregnant woman and a 20 year Chief (Petty Officer, MSGT to you Army types) having the same figure problem.

    If the kilt is made to fit you, then these measurements are critical. Since all the off the peg kilts are too short for me, I cannot say where the best place to wear them is, my guess is where they feel comfortable.

    I agree it is easier to shorten a kilt than to lengthen one, at least until they get a Kilt Stretcher. So just wear it wherever it is comfortable. Just remember not to have the length below the middle of the kneecap. That just looks sloppy in my book.

    The pipes are calling, resistance is futile. - MacTalla Mor

  7. #7
    Join Date
    22nd November 06
    Posts
    296
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Carolina Kiltman View Post
    Just a couple of comments: On a man, the waist is almost always at the naval.
    I'm sorry but if you mean "natural waist" (the most narrow part of the torso) I must disagree. Its typically about 1" above the naval but can be much higher. The lower, of course, the hip/waist ratio the less "natural" the waist :-)

    On a woman it is somewhat lower. This is pretty much a constant, with only very slight variations. (Don't ask my why, ask the designer!
    Women are typically shorter and their waists are, in general, more narrow (women tend to be more pear shaped while men more apple formed but that's just "tend" and no hard rule) but their waistlines are not lower or higher--- nor their legs longer (its an aim of clothing design and fashion to create the impression of longer legs, shorter torso and smaller waist to signal youth and fertility).

    If the kilt is made to fit you, then these measurements are critical. Since all the off the peg kilts are too short for me, I cannot say where the best place to wear them is, my guess is where they feel comfortable.
    Where the kilt should sit is a design criteria. Some kilts are like common skirts designed to sit on the hips, others at the "natural waist" ("traditional") and still others right under the ribs ("army"). Traditional and army kilts need to fit tight and snug--- so snug that if you don't pull in your gut and hold your breath it should not be able to move by tugging.

    Just remember not to have the length below the middle of the kneecap. That just looks sloppy in my book.
    But again it can be a fashion statement. Have a look at some of the offering from TFCK including over the knee models--- the difference between women's and men's being, at best, the perception of "minimum length" for "modesty" (with men, of course, extending somewhat lower).

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123

Similar Threads

  1. SWK Standard on the way
    By Brewboy in forum Kilt Board Newbie
    Replies: 35
    Last Post: 13th May 08, 03:36 PM
  2. New SWK Standard
    By durbinite in forum Show us your pics
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 4th March 08, 08:41 PM
  3. Utilikilt lengths
    By pbpersson in forum Kilt Advice
    Replies: 32
    Last Post: 28th July 06, 10:20 PM
  4. Stillwater kilt lengths and styles
    By pbpersson in forum General Kilt Talk
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 5th July 06, 01:52 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

» Log in

User Name:

Password:

Not a member yet?
Register Now!
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.0