X Marks the Scot - An on-line community of kilt wearers.
-
14th January 09, 11:58 AM
#61
![Quote](http://www.xmarksthescot.com/forum/images/misc/quote_icon.png) Originally Posted by Ancienne Alliance
Oups ! My English really isn't up to standard ! ![Confused](http://www.xmarksthescot.com/forum/images/smilies/icon_confused.gif)
For I ment to say exactly what you are saying .
Perhaps I should have said : "The Normans have only been recently considered French (hence my bold "today")
Thanks for being patient with me .
Best,
Robert
No worries, Robert! I was afraid I wasn't being clear enough.
All's well that's ends well.
Tally-ho!
Todd
-
-
14th January 09, 02:52 PM
#62
![Quote](http://www.xmarksthescot.com/forum/images/misc/quote_icon.png) Originally Posted by Pleater
...
There are some oddities which show up unexpected genetic differences, and coupled with a few fossil finds of individuals with both Neanderthal and Sapiens features it does suggest that there was interbreeding.
...
This theory is now discounted.
-
Similar Threads
-
By g koch in forum General Kilt Talk
Replies: 33
Last Post: 16th February 06, 02:44 AM
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks