|
-
8th November 12, 11:19 AM
#1
Just curious, and in know way judgemental...are you all saying all your kilts contain fringed edges?
-
-
8th November 12, 11:24 AM
#2
 Originally Posted by Domehead
Just curious, and in know way judgemental...are you all saying all your kilts contain fringed edges?
Mine does and so will my next kilt, but thats not to say that not having one is wrong. Its just a matter of personal taste.
Last edited by Grizzly; 8th November 12 at 11:25 AM.
Friends stay in touch on FB simon Taylor-dando
Best regards
Simon
-
-
8th November 12, 11:35 AM
#3
Yes, Yes. Again, not passing any judgement. When I was deciding on my first kilt, I began drinking up much of Matthew A.C. Newsome's research on the historic edifices for the box-pleated kilts. When I found the images of the earliest examples, I never gave it another thought. Over the years, I've come to realize that the "norm" is an 8yd knife-pleat, most likely with a fringed edge...fair to say? I guess I did'nae realize the 4yd box-pleat is still (relative, again) a tad avante gaurd, even among kilties. Now, I've developed an internal image: me in highland dress (whether realistic or not) and I can't see myself wearing anything else - which may or may not be a good thing.
Last edited by Domehead; 8th November 12 at 11:36 AM.
Reason: spelling
-
-
8th November 12, 11:47 AM
#4
From my own experience I've always associated Fringe = civilian, No fringe = military
I exclude the London Scottish here, who wear a blue fringe down the Hodden Grey.
-
-
8th November 12, 11:51 AM
#5
MacSpadger & Tobus,
I have a follow-up question re: the likely origins (not practicalities of) civilian: fringe / military: no fringe. But, I do not want to offend the OP with a hijacking, or the MODS for that matter. Any advice?
Last edited by Domehead; 8th November 12 at 11:52 AM.
Reason: spelling
-
-
8th November 12, 11:59 AM
#6
I wouldn't know beans about the origin of fringe. That's a question for Matt et al. As for hijacking, you could always just start a new thread to talk about the various fringe issues you're thinking of.
-
-
8th November 12, 12:02 PM
#7
 Originally Posted by Tobus
various fringe issues
I am not sure whether to laugh or cry. That was a horrible pun.
Well done!
-
-
8th November 12, 11:27 AM
#8
I prefer the look of a fringe on the apron. To me it adds a "finishing" touch. However, that being said, I have one casual kilt with no fringe on the edge of the apron but a very small fringe along the bottom of the kilt. I understand that some mills, at least used to, finish their material that way.
proud U.S. Navy vet
Creag ab Sgairbh
-
-
8th November 12, 11:33 AM
#9
 Originally Posted by Domehead
Just curious, and in know way judgemental...are you all saying all your kilts contain fringed edges?
The only kilts I've ever owned that didn't have a fringed apron are my military kilt (these are not made with fringed edges) and a PV casual kilt. All my traditional kilts, plus my box-pleated kilt, and even my cheapie acrylic kilt are all made with a fringed apron. It's by far the norm to see fringe on a civilian wool kilt.
-
-
8th November 12, 05:19 PM
#10
 Originally Posted by Domehead
Just curious, and in know way judgemental...are you all saying all your kilts contain fringed edges?
I have nine made-to-measure wool kilts: Four by USA Kilts (fringed) and five by Matt Newsome (unfringed). I can't really say I have a preference or feel that either looks wrong, and I happily swish both ways.

(Edited to add postscript: I should also mention that at no time when I've worn any of the Newsome kilts has any observer ever seemed to notice that there was no fringe.)
Last edited by Dale Seago; 8th November 12 at 05:22 PM.
"It's all the same to me, war or peace,
I'm killed in the war or hung during peace."
-
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks