X Marks the Scot - An on-line community of kilt wearers.

   X Marks Partners - (Go to the Partners Dedicated Forums )
USA Kilts website Celtic Croft website Celtic Corner website Houston Kiltmakers

User Tag List

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 25

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    6th February 10
    Location
    U.S.
    Posts
    8,180
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Ridiculous indeed. I heard about this through my good mate and professional piper, Matt Pantaleoni. He's just over in Scotland right now competing in the solo-piping circuit and heard the news there. Let's just say he's furious! And rightly so. He has been urging his fellow pipers and pipe enthusiasts here in America to write to their respected Congressman and Senators, as well as sign the various petitions that have been circulating.

    "If you are a piper or piping enthusiast -- whether you own ivory pipes or not -- I urge you to write to your Congressman and Senators and make them aware of the new executive order's devastating impact on musicians generally and particularly pipers. We must make our voice heard! Musicians are not criminals!"

    -Professional Piper and Piping Instructor Matt Pantaleoni, August 5, 2014

    http://www.king5.com/news/local/Ivor...262753251.html

    http://www.forbes.com/sites/dougband...-as-criminals/
    Last edited by creagdhubh; 5th August 14 at 11:00 AM.

  2. The Following User Says 'Aye' to creagdhubh For This Useful Post:


  3. #2
    Join Date
    6th June 14
    Location
    Hong Kong
    Posts
    278
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    A politically correct world gone mad.

    Is this sort of thing happening just in North America or elsewhere as well?

    I've certainly travelled to/from the UK on a number of occasions with silver and ivory mounted pipes and the only time I've ever been stopped was going through security at Edinburgh Airport when the security guard, a former soldier; asked whether my drones were .303 or 7.62mm.

    Once he laughed at his own joke, he let me through without any further issue.

  4. The Following 4 Users say 'Aye' to Ron Abbott For This Useful Post:


  5. #3
    Join Date
    19th October 09
    Location
    South Queensferry, Scotland
    Posts
    616
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Unhappy

    Hopefully good sense will prevail and the pipes will not share the fate of the old sealskin sporrans that Scottish wedding guests had confiscated by US customs ... and never returned.
    It's coming yet for a' that,
    That Man to Man, the world o'er,
    Shall brothers be for a' that. - RB

  6. The Following 2 Users say 'Aye' to MacRobert's Reply For This Useful Post:


  7. #4
    Join Date
    6th February 10
    Location
    U.S.
    Posts
    8,180
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    The pipes have been returned, after a hefty fine was paid, of course.

  8. #5
    Join Date
    3rd July 13
    Location
    Melbourne Victoria Australia
    Posts
    153
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    <dons Nomex suit >
    There is another side to this -- elephants are getting way
    too close to extinction. And the reason is ivory.

    Don't misunderstand me, I'm fully aware that the pipes under
    discussion were from a time when the extinction was not an
    issue. But I believe that there is a real need to make sure that
    anything that includes ivory is clearly certified as not being
    "modern ivory". And this is not PC gone mad or anything of the
    sort. There are a lot of ivory poachers out there who'd like
    nothing more than to manage to get their ivory certified as being
    from "before".

    I personally have a good deal of sympathy with the pipers in the
    original story. The real problem is setting up a system that will
    protect living elephants without making things impossible for
    those who own historic ivory items. It sounds like they may
    have got it wrong this time. But if you think that it is important
    that your children/grandchildren should have the chance to see
    an elephant in the wild, then you need to consider the importance
    of this protection.

    -Don

  9. The Following 6 Users say 'Aye' to Aussie_Don For This Useful Post:


  10. #6
    Join Date
    20th December 10
    Location
    Maine
    Posts
    140
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    With respect to our brother's across the "pond", Americans have a long history (238 years) of disliking high handed government interference.

    This system that caught these teenage boys is fraught with bureaucratic idiocy. The professional ivory smuggler is not going to deal with teenagers as mules. He is going to bury 50 pounds of the stuff in a shipping container of something else and run it through a busy seaport. He is going to take his time and have all his papers in order so as not to raise suspicion. Most of the time, customs will not bother with something so complicated.

    However 2 kids who told customs they had the items before they went into Canada and declared them upon return. That is just easy picking for the bored customs agent who would rather be catching all those illegal Canadians slipping into the US in search of a better life. (I pull my tongue out of my cheek and not go further in fear of becoming political)

    Truth is I appreciate our border agents and believe they are trying to do a good job in a tough situation. Bureaucratic idiocy is systemic and given a choice most bureaucrats will want to do the right thing.

  11. The Following 2 Users say 'Aye' to tky58 For This Useful Post:


  12. #7
    Join Date
    1st October 13
    Location
    Arkansas
    Posts
    376
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    The answer: paint over the ivory.

  13. #8
    Join Date
    1st October 13
    Location
    Arkansas
    Posts
    376
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Imho the problem is that all the foreign gov. burn or otherwise destroy ivory captured from poachers when it could be sold to reduce demand. Some african nations have special permission to do that now. This will not entirely end poaching but along with tighter enforcement of poaching laws (not possession of small quantities) and increasing stability of nations that contain elephants poaching will be greatly reduced.

  14. #9
    Join Date
    9th March 09
    Location
    Gardner MA USA
    Posts
    3,797
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by creagdhubh View Post
    The pipes have been returned, after a hefty fine was paid, of course.
    What is the whole story? Why a fine if he had the certificates? How much was the fine?

  15. #10
    Join Date
    1st February 12
    Location
    Northeast Ohio, USA
    Posts
    1,387
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by creagdhubh View Post
    The pipes have been returned, after a hefty fine was paid, of course.
    So what's to stop the same thing from happening again, I wonder? Upon paying the fines, were they given documentation that exempts the pipes from future seizures? Or are they still at risk of repeat, every time they travel?
    KEN CORMACK
    Clan Buchanan
    U.S. Coast Guard, Retired
    Cuyahoga Falls, Ohio, USA

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

» Log in

User Name:

Password:

Not a member yet?
Register Now!
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.2.0